March 16, 2004 Minutes
The Lindon City Council held a regularly
scheduled meeting beginning with a Birthday Party for Lindon City at
6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 16, 2004 in the Lindon City Center, Council
Chambers, at 100 North State Street, Lindon, Utah.
BIRTHDAY PARTY - 6:00 p.m.
The Lindon City Council and the Lindon City Historical Preservation
Committee will host a "Birthday Party" for the City. The City
was created 80 years ago this month. All citizens have been invited to
attend.
Mayor Ellertson, members of the Historic Preservation Committee, and
staff welcomed the residents to celebrate Lindon City's 80th Birthday
with them. There were reminiscences from the residents of Lindon, recognition
of those 80 and older and those who have lived in Lindon the longest,
and stories of days gone by. Residents were given door prizes and cake.
There were about 100 residents in attendance, including seventeen that
were 80 years old or older. These were Maxine Davis, Lorna Walker, Audra
Hooley, Owen Hooley, Helen Walker, Marge Walker, Iva Walker, Lamar Scott,
Vergia Scott, Ted Clegg, Elma Clegg, Harold Erickson, Elvie Erickson,
Vera Cluff, Velma Gillman, Kenneth Gillman, and June Cullimore. Pictures
were taken for the newspaper.
REGULAR SESSION - 7:30 p.m.
Conducting: Larry A. Ellertson, Mayor
Pledge of Allegiance: Bryce Moss, Troop 874
Invocation: Bruce Carpenter
PRESENT
Larry A. Ellertson, Mayor
Jeff Acerson, Councilmember (arrived at 7:46 p.m.)
H. Toby Bath, Councilmember
Bruce Carpenter, Councilmember
Jerald I. Hatch, Councilmember
Ott H. Dameron, City Administrator
Kevin Smith, Planning Director
Venla Gubler, Administrative Clerk
ABSENT
Lindsey Bayless, Councilmember
The meeting began at 7:34 p.m.
MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of March 2, 2004 will be reviewed.
The minutes of the regular meeting of March 2, 2004 were reviewed. The
following corrections were made:
Page 2, Line 42, 43: Add the phrase "which is an example of a legislative
process" to the end of the sentence after the word "year,"
Page 3, Line 17: Add the phrase "without due process" at the
end of the sentence after the word "meeting."
Page 7, Line 18,19: Add the words "queuing to enter" after the
word "traffic." Delete the word "entering." Add the
words "from 600 North" after the word "site." Replace
the word "clearing" with the words " being able to clear."
Page 11, Line 4: Replace the words "will only work if" with
the words "assumes that."
Page 11, Line 5: Replace the word "are" with the word "will."
COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF MARCH 2, 2004
AS CORRECTED. COUNCILMEMBER HATCH SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED
IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
OPEN SESSION - Citizens Comments
Mayor Ellertson commented that there is a "hero among us."
He asked Captain Cullimore to introduce this person who has literally
saved someone's life. Captain Cullimore introduced Dennis Thomas to the
audience and explained that he was is a citizen of Lindon who had gone
beyond the call of duty. He told the audience that Mr. Thomas performed
the Heimlich maneuver for a man who was choking and had turned blue at
the Wendy's on North State Street. He observed that he then quietly left
the scene and had to be found to recognize his efforts. He noted that
Mr. Thomas had members of this family with him tonight. Mr. Thomas introduced
his wife, Emily, his two children, his mother, father, sister, mother-in-law
and father-in-law to the audience. Captain Cullimore commended Mr. Thomas
as "an example to us all." There was applause and Mayor Ellertson
and Captain Cullimore shook Mr. Thomas's hand. Mayor Ellertson presented
a token of appreciation to Mr. Thomas (movie tickets and car wash tokens.)
Mayor Ellertson commented that he appreciates the example of Mr. Thomas
and added that actions such as his are what make a community great. He
observed that Mr. Thomas didn't have to get involved, but he recognized
a need and did something about it. He expressed his thanks to Mr. Thomas.
Mayor Ellertson asked if there were any citizens present that wished
to address the Council. Mr. Ross Childs and his wife Charmaine, of 388
West 600 North, told the Council that they had attended the Planning Commission
meeting last week and were advised to address the Council about their
concern. He explained that their home on 600 North is halfway within Commercial
zoning and half within Residential zoning. They have been trying to sell
the home and would like to rezone the parcel to be completely commercial.
He explained that they have not been able to sell the home as a residential
property because of the offices across the street and the other commercial
development planned for the area. He reported that the Planning Commission
had advised them to contact the other owners on the street to determine
their wishes and plans so that a zone change would not adversely affect
them. He commented that he had contacted most of the property owners on
this section of 600 North and most were in favor of a zone change. Mayor
Ellertson commented that there was a formal process to changing the zone.
Mr. Childs agreed and noted that his intent was just to make the Council
aware of his intentions.
(Councilmember Acerson arrived at 7:46 p.m.)
Mr. Melvin Olsen of 1237 East 50 North, told the Council that he had
purchased a five-acre parcel on Teton Drive and 1200 East about two years
ago to build a park for his twelve children and thirty-four grandchildren.
His plan is to start with planting trees. He informed the Council that
he checked with the Planning Department about his plans and was told that
his parcel is subject to the Hillside Ordinance and a grading and revegetation
plan needed to be submitted. After considerable engineering expense, he
found that he was not subject to the Hillside Ordinance. He asked for
a water meter to get initial water to establish his seedling trees and
was told that he needed to turn in water rights to the City. He found
that finding surface water rights is hard, but that well rights are readily
available. He also found that the State Division of Water Rights requires
less water per acre than Lindon City. He has now acquired a well and water
rights for his parcel. He was given an access easement from the seller
(Canberra Development) to cross City-owned land adjacent to his parcel.
The forest service installed a gate, but he was not given a key. He asked
for a key and was referred back and forth between the Forest Service and
Lindon City before he was finally given a key.
Mr. Olsen told the Council that he was invited to come to DRC to discuss
his plans for the parcel. He told them about his park with grass, trees,
playground and bathrooms. He was told that he could pay the impact fees
to connect to the sewer system. He asked for temporary water for his trees
and was given permission. He was asked his long term plans and told the
Committee that he may build a house in the future. He was told that the
fire marshal is concerned about the distance to the hydrant. He pointed
out that there are many homes in Lindon farther from a hydrant than he
is. The DRC asked about the possibility of the City purchasing the land
where the water lines run to connect to the water tank above him and giving
up his access across city land on the north side. He had declined because
he would need a new road for access.
Mr. Olsen informed the Council that he applied for a building permit
in February for his park pavilion and was told that he needed to submit
water rights for fire protection and to meet the requirements for subdivision
development. He explained that he has not found a requirement in the City
Code for water submittals for fire protection just for irrigation.
He said that he was here to ask what he has to do to build a park. He
observed that he had read in the Code that he can request a relief provision
on water. He would like to ask for relief because he has a well and water
rights that are sufficient for his own irrigation. He would also ask permission
to use the City's fire protection system. He asserted that he is a good
citizen and that the Council does not need to protect the citizens of
Lindon from his actions. Mayor Ellertson replied that he would like to
review Mr. Olsen's allegations and requested time to get back to him.
Mr. Olsen observed that it had been a "long road" and he would
like to get these issues resolved.
Ms. Kara Pittman of 94 North 1200 East, asked the Council if they had
made a decision about letting her purchase a parcel of City property adjacent
to her home for her horses. The Council discussed their remembrances of
their discussion, as it had been some time since the request. It was decided
that the issue needed to be revisited to refresh memories and come to
a concrete decision. Mayor Ellertson noted that no official action had
been taken yet in any case. Ms. Pittman asked for expeditiousness as she
would like to construct this spring. She was assured that the Council
would let her know. Mayor Ellertson asked if there was any other comment.
There was none.
MAYOR'S COMMENTS/REPORT
Mayor Ellertson announced that earlier this evening Lindon had celebrated
its 80th birthday with a number of citizens. He reported that as many
as fifteen to twenty citizens 80 years old or older had attended and commented
that these citizens had contributed much hard work into the early beginnings
of Lindon. He asked if there were questions.
Councilmember Acerson asked for an update on UTOPIA. Mayor Ellertson
explained that UTOPIA is a project which will bring broadband capabilities
to Lindon in the form of a fiber optic network. He noted that Lindon City
has been working on this project for about a year. The project was started
at the request of a number of residents. Lindon has joined with seventeen
other cities to collectively build an infrastructure that would allow
for multiple competing providers to serve the citizens. He noted that
the Utah Legislature had proposed some legislation that would limit and
possibly preclude UTOPIA'a bonding capabilities, but the version that
passed will allow those cities that have declared their intentions and
taken action to participate to continue to do so. Councilmember Carpenter
asked about Lindon's declaration of participation. Mayor Ellertson replied
that Lindon had done so when they agreed to back the bonding and that
another opportunity to demonstrate support will come when the financial
plan is presented to the City in a later meeting. He asked if there were
other questions. There were none.
CONSENT AGENDA - No Items
CURRENT BUSINESS
1. Public Hearing - Zoning Ordinance
Amendment - Nonconforming Buildings and Uses. The City Council
will hear public comment and possibly act to approve a proposed ordinance
revision and amendment to Chapter 17.16 - Nonconforming Buildings and
Uses of the Lindon City Code. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
COUNCILMEMBER BATH MOVED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. COUNCILMEMBER ACERSON
SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Smith distributed a copy of the current ordinance for comparison
purposes. He observed that the current ordinance could be interpreted
as dealing mostly with nonconforming structures and is not clear on dealing
with nonconforming uses. The Planning Commission had suggested a revision
when struggling with the issues surrounding the recent Utah Auto Sales
expansion. He pointed out the significant changes in the ordinance, including
the addition of a purpose, intent and definition section and the clarification
of Section 17.16.030.
Councilmember Carpenter commented that the Planning Commission had been
reluctant to approve an expansion of a nonconforming use, but felt that
without a clarification of the ordinance, there was no clear requirement
for denial. They had requested that their discomfort be put in writing.
He also noted that the Planning Commission had spent some time discussing
the meaning of the word "harmony" as it is used in this section
and had decided that "harmony" means it is consistent with the
zone. Mr. Smith agreed and cited an example in the commercial zone. Mr.
Dameron suggested that the word "harmony" allows for flexibility
in the application of the ordinance. Mr. Smith agreed, and noted that
the second finding in this section gives the protection element. Mayor
Ellertson questioned whether the section causes confusion with a contradiction
of termsnot imposing an unreasonable burden and yet does
not violate the development policies. He pointed out that if the use is
nonconforming, it could be at odds with the policies. Mr. Smith explained
that the development policies are contained in the General Plan and are
very general in nature. Mayor Ellertson confirmed that Mr. Smith does
not see any problems in the administration of the ordinance. Mr. Smith
replied no.
Councilmember Carpenter suggested that the flexibility gives the Planning
Commission and Council a certain amount of "clout" in interpretation.
He suggested that they discuss the "loss of nonconforming status"
section. He asked if this section only covers loss of use and whether
there was any way to lose the use of a structure. Mr. Smith replied no.
The Council discussed the change in loss of use that is proposed to change
from one year to six months and its ramifications. Determining when a
use is "abandoned" was discussed. Mayor Ellertson suggested
that the other side of this issue is a business that goes out of business
and wants to sell the building. He suggested that a restaurant has a lot
of specialized equipment and may require expensive retrofitting to another
use if it is not sold within the six month limit. Mr. Smith suggested
the addition of a clause that would allow a hearing for extension. He
noted also that a business license can be maintained even if the business
is closed for a period of time.
Councilmember Carpenter observed that the purpose of the nonconforming
use ordinance is to gradually phase out these nonconforming uses. He suggested
a time limit on the "grandfather" clause. He noted that the
purpose of the "grandfather" clause is to allow an owner to
recoup their investment from the property, but that the goal is to remove
these nonconforming uses. Mayor Ellertson clarified that it is his intent
to "encourage them to discontinue." Councilmember Carpenter
agreed and noted that other ordinances have a time limit. Mayor Ellertson
asked Mr. Smith if there was a lot of nonconforming uses that continue
for indefinite periods. Mr. Smith replied yes and then observed that there
are nonconforming uses in all zones and some that are assets to the community.
He noted that there are some nonconforming uses that improve and enhance
their use within the zone and others that detract and aggravate their
neighbors. Councilmember Bath expressed the opinion that trying to push
out certain uses may creates a discriminatory situation. The Council discussed
hypothetical situations for various businesses in Lindon. Councilmember
Carpenter suggested that if the nonconforming use ordinance does not have
a time limit, it does not have clout. He felt that waiting for people
to fail their businesses is not a good business model.
Mr. Dameron clarified that Councilmember Carpenter is suggesting an amortization
clause that gives a nonconforming business a time limit to conform or
leave. Mayor Ellertson asked what happens if a business is doing major
modifications to the building. Councilmember Acerson replied that the
approach is that during their modifications, they include elements to
bring the building into conforming status. The Council discussed nonconforming
businesses that are gaining value without giving back to the community
in the form of visual enhancement.
Mayor Ellertson asked about section 040 which allows an alteration or
enlargement of a nonconforming use when they supplement their parking
to meet the required needs. Mr. Smith noted that this allows a business
to be creative to supply their parking needs. Mayor Ellertson asked if
there are other regulations that should be addressed in section 050 on
reconstruction of a damaged building. Mr. Smith replied that this section
allows reconstruction, but moves the use toward compliance by meeting
the current setbacks and building height regulations.
Mayor Ellertson returned the discussion to the loss of legal nonconforming
status section. He expressed concern that the City may create a loss situation.
Mr. Smith suggested that the loss of nonconforming use status will expire
unless the owner can give a legitimate reason for its extension. The Council
discussed noticing and disclosure of this possibility to nonconforming
uses. It was decided that a general disclosure on the business license
application may be sufficient. There was further discussion on the determination
of nonconforming status, and noticing distances on intent to expand, modify
or amend a nonconforming use.
Mayor Ellertson asked if there were other comments or suggestions. It
was decided to make the changes and bring it back for further review.
There was a question from Harlow Clark, newspaper representative, on whether
nonconforming buildings are allowed to rebuild after a fire or other major
distaster. He was assured that the ordinance allows rebuilding.
COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER MOVED TO CONTINUE THE REQUEST TO REVISE AND AMEND
CHAPTER 17.16. NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES, OF THE LINDON CITY CODE.
COUNCILMEMBER ACERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
2. Review and Action - Westside Master Plan
Values Survey. The Planning Staff has revised the survey instrument
which has been designed to obtain the opinions of the Mayor, City Council
members and Planning Commission members concerning the proposed Westside
Master Plan. The survey will be completed by the Mayor and each Council
member during the allotted time.
Mr. Smith distributed the amended survey, explained the rankings and
encouraged the Council to make comments. The survey was completed. There
was a short discussion and demonstration of various trail surfacing options.
COUNCIL REPORTS:
WATER, SEWER, SOLID WASTE, HOUSING CONSORTIUM
Councilmember Hatch reported that the annual resolution for the Housing
Consortium was due. He noted that he has an example. The Council discussed
the allocation of funds for the coming year. Progress on the Hollow Park
home was reported on. Councilmember Hatch reported that the North Union
Canal Company is predicting an 80% allotment, but that the Provo River
Water Users are predicting a 20% allotment. He also reported that the
board voted on the animal control shelter location. The proposed location
was identified on a map and the project discussed.
TRAILS, PLANNING, ZONING, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS,
ADMINISTRATION
Councilmember Bayless was excused.
PUBLIC SAFETY, COURT, BUILDING INSPECTIONS
Councilmember Bath reported that ATEC, the Alpine Transition and Employment
Center, had requested some clean up on the sidewalks near their facility.
He also commented that Captain Cullimore had requested a key to the forest
service gate for enforcement purposes. He noted that the process will
start on the safety department budget next week.
PARKS, RECREATION, ENGINEERING, LINDON FAIR,
NEWLETTER
Councilmember Acerson thanked the Public Works Department for their diligent
efforts to keep the streets in good repair. Councilmember Hatch noted
the existence of a pothole on 400 West. Councilmember Acerson reported
that he hoped to have a commitment for Lindon Days Chair by the end of
the week. He asked Mayor Ellertson about a date for a drug awareness seminar
sponsored jointly by the City, Character Connection, and the ecclesiastical
community. This date was confirmed as April 29, 2004.
GENERAL PLAN, STREETS AND SIDEWALKS, PUBLIC
BUILDINGS
Councilmember Carpenter reported that he had visited with Public Works
Director Don Peterson about the staff position he had requested at the
Retreat. He also asked about a citizen request for help with a water bill.
Mr. Dameron explained how the misunderstanding had occurred and assured
him that the issue was being addressed fairly. Councilmember Carpenter
reminded the Council about UDOT requesting a master plan decision for
the 200 South Freeway overpass. Mr. Dameron replied that the route is
designated as a major collector on the Lindon City General Plan and that
the engineers have assured him that the width is adequate. The Council
discussed this designation and this street's eventual width.
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
Mr. Dameron:
1. Reminded the Council about the joint City Council and Planning Commission
executive session the next night at 7:00 p.m.
2. Announced the Engineering Coordination meeting for Thursday, March
18th at 8a.m. Councilmembers Acerson and Carpenter volunteered to attend.
3. Noted the Lindon/Pleasant Grove Coordination meeting is set for April
5 at 4:45 p.m. at the Pleasant Grove Community Development Building. Councilmembers
Bath and Acerson volunteered to attend.
4. Asked for hearing requests from the most recent Project Tracking List.
There were none.
5. Reported that the Lindon Planning Interns had visited Vineyard to discuss
plans for the TimpLake Trail. They returned with a positive report that
Vineyard was cooperative.
6. Commented that the Mountainview Corridor Workshop will be March 22
at 8:00 p.m. in the UDOT Region #3 offices. Councilmember Acerson, Mayor
Ellertson, Mr. Dameron, Mr. Smith, Mr. Thurgood and Mr. Peterson will
attend.
7. Requested a meeting date for the Budget Committee. Wednesday, March
24, at 4:30 p.m. was decided on.
8. Reported on the status of the traffic studies that were requested by
the City Council. The Lindon Elementary study is being held up temporarily
because the school has not tendered the school routing plan. The 200 East
study has been hampered by the inadvertent removal of the counting hoses
by the snow plow. The engineer estimates that this information will be
available by the April 6 meeting.
There was further discussion on trail surface options.
COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER MOVED TO APPROVE THE PAY VOUCHERS. COUNCILMEMBER
BATH SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURN
COUNCILMEMBER HATCH MOVED TO ADJOURN THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 10:17
P.M. COUNCILMEMBER BATH SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR.
THE MOTION CARRIED.
APPROVED - April 6, 2004
back to top |