|
|
Home » City Government » Council » Schedule: Agendas and Minutes 2005 » Council Minutes 2005 » June 7, 2005
June 7, 2005
The Lindon City Council held a regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday, June 7, 2005, beginning with a work session at 6:00 p.m. at the Lindon City Center, City Council Chambers, at 100 North State Street, Lindon, Utah.
WORK SESSION -
PRESENT ABSENT
Jeff Acerson, Mayor Eric Anthony, Councilmember
H. Toby Bath, Councilmember Jerald I. Hatch, Councilmember
Lindsey Bayless, Councilmember
Bruce Carpenter, Councilmember
Ott H. Dameron, City Administrator
Adam Cowie, Planning Director
John Martineau, Planning Intern
Debra Cullimore, Deputy Recorder
The meeting began at 6:14
DISCUSSION
The Mayor and City Council will meet in a work session with the property owners on the west side of the city, their representatives, and a residential developer to discuss potential residential development in the area.
Mayor Acerson expressed appreciation for the attendance of those present and excused members of the Council who were not in attendance.
Griff Johnson of Fieldstone Developers was the representative for the developers. Several property owners were also in attendance. Mr. Johnson showed an aerial view of the area of proposed development and the surrounding areas. He also showed a graphic which illustrated the zoning in the area. Mr. Johnson showed a drawing of the previous proposed development for comparison with the revised proposal. Mr. Johnson presented several alternatives for the proposed development. He stated that Alternative Four had been reviewed at DRC approximately two weeks ago. He presented specifics of the Alternative Four proposal, stating that it includes a gross density of five units per acre with half acre lots on the perimeter, two areas of multiple family homes, and two areas of patio homes.
Mr. Johnson stated that since that time, there have been additional modifications to the proposal which have resulted in two additional alternative proposals, which were referred to as Alternative Three and Alternative Five. Mr. Johnson presented the specifics of each of these proposals.
Mr. Johnson stated that in Alternative Three the layout of the streets had been modified, but that the larger lots were still located on the outside perimeter. Mr. Johnson noted the significant size of the proposed park, as well as three cul-de-sac streets. He pointed out that one area of patio homes had been modified, and was now proposed as single family homes on forty foot wide lots. These homes would be similar to a town home, but would include a garage and a private yard. In comparison, Alternative Five patterned the homes in the multi family area after a manor type home. In addition, twin homes, and triplexes, and fourplexes were included. Mr. Johnson pointed out that an effort had been made to maintain the creek side road.
Councilmember Carpenter noted that it appeared that Alternative Five was preferred by Mr. Johnson, and asked if it was due to cost vs. benefit of the proposal. Mr. Johnson stated that he prefers Alternative Five based on the design elements. Mayor Acerson inquired as to the number of units, and asked if the target number is 267, to which Mr. Johnson answered affirmatively.
The Council then discussed the open spaces provided for in the proposals. Councilmember Carpenter noted that each area of open space increases the cost of the residential spaces. Councilmember Bayless commented that there may be less of a need for open spaces near the patio home areas, due to the fact that there would be fewer families with children occupying the patio homes, as they are intended for use as retirement homes. She also commented on the need for affordable retirement housing in Lindon. Mr. Johnson noted that if there is no fencing between the patio homes it tends to create a feeling of open space. He suggested the possibility of fencing the perimeter of the patio home area for security purposes, but leaving the interior lots open. Mr. Dameron noted that the city requirement for open space is six acres per one thousand residents. He also stated that there is currently an average of four residents per household in Lindon. Councilmember Carpenter observed that if the number of residents per household is consistent with the rest of the City, the proposed development would consist of approximately 1,000 residents, which would require six acres of open space. He noted that impact fees charged by the City could help in meeting the open space requirement.
Mr. Dameron inquired as to the size of the single family lots in the proposed development. Mr. Johnson stated that Alternative Five provides for ten 16,000 square foot lots, two 10,000 square foot lots, and eighty nine 5,000 square foot lots. Mr. Dameron asked if there were any lots proposed at 20,000 square feet. Mr. Johnson responded that there are no lots in Alternative Five which are 20,000 square feet, but that they had made an effort to keep with the spirit of what the City wanted to accomplish with the development. Mr. Dameron asked Mr. Cowie if horses or other animals would be permitted on the 16,000 square foot lots. Mr. Cowie responded that they would not be allowed. Mayor Acerson pointed out that animal rights are one thing the Council wants to establish in the development, as it is a reflection of what Lindon is and has been. Mr. Johnson observed that in order to accomplish 20,000 square foot lots, it would be necessary to eliminate the curvilinear roads. Councilmember Carpenter noted that including the large lots in the development forces the smaller lots to be reduced further in size.
Councilmember Bayless inquired as to the proposed design of the multi-family units. Councilmember Carpenter asked if the design would have the appearance of a single family home, but be multiple units. Mr. Johnson stated that the design is intended to include three units in a dwelling which has the appearance of a single family home. Councilmember Bayless also inquired as to plans to include a clubhouse or pool area. Mr. Johnson stated that there is a potential to include one or the other. He suggested the possibility of a clubhouse area with a hot tub. Mayor Acerson observed that such areas can be a place where people gather, and can help to unify the community.
The Council discussed further options for including 20,000 square foot lots in the development. Several options were discussed, including more multiple family units, eliminating the curvilinear streets, and removing the smaller lots from the area with the larger lots. Councilmember Bath noted that he would not like to see animal rights in the area eliminated. Mr. Johnson stated that he will make an effort to include four or five 20,000 square foot lots in the development. Mr. Johnson inquired as to the number of animals allowed on a 20,000 square foot lot. Mr. Cowie stated that the current ordinance allows four horses. Mr. Johnson suggested the use of a CCR in the development to further restrict the number of animals allowed. Councilmember Carpenter informed Mr. Johnson that the City will not enforce a CCR for a development. Mayor Acerson clarified that if a CCR is more restrictive than City ordinance, the City will not enforce it. There was a discussion regarding the current ordinance relating to allowable number of animals, and the possibility of revisiting it. Councilmember Bayless stated that she felt the intent of the ordinance was not to have four horses. Planning Commissioner Ron Anderson was present in the audience, and commented that as he remembered it, the intent was to allow two horses and two smaller farm type animals.
Mr. Johnson discussed specifications for the single family homes. He stated that they range from 1,300 square feet to 3,000 square feet, and that the footprint of the smaller building lots is approximately 30 x 60 feet. Mr. Johnson went on to say that the largest homes would have an eighteen foot setback. Councilmember Bath expressed concern regarding possible safety issues related to such small setbacks, with his main concern being that fire may spread easily from one unit to another. Mr. Johnson noted that the setbacks are within code requirements, and that fire retardant walls could be used. Mr. Cowie noted that he has recently been looking for a home to purchase, and has seen several similar developments in the valley. Councilmember Bath stated that the City may have to make some concessions, but felt that the setbacks should not be allowed at eighteen feet.
Mr. Dameron suggested giving Mr. Johnson specific principles, such as minimum lot size. Councilmember Carpenter observed that while the Council may provide principles, there is tendency for those principles to be competing principles, such as requiring large lots along with a required minimum lot size. Mr. Dameron suggested that the Council should give Mr. Johnson the principles and let him work with them. Mr. Johnson observed that no proposal will make all Councilmembers happy on every point, but stated that he will make an effort to come up with a proposal that will work. The Council discussed specific principles, which Mr. Dameron reviewed for Mr. Johnson. The principles given were as follows; minimum lot size of 4,000 square feet, 20,000 square foot lots around the perimeter of the development, a larger park, and overall density of five units or less per acre.
Councilmember Carpenter expressed appreciation to Mr. Johnson for his time and effort in preparing the proposals. Councilmember Bayless commented that Mr. Johnson has been “wonderful to work with.” Mr. Dameron suggested that Mr. Johnson make revisions and present the proposal at the next DRC, after which a design review by the Planning Commission can be scheduled.
REGULAR SESSION – 7:00 P.M.
The meeting was called to order at 7:06 p.m.
Conducting: Jeff Acerson, Mayor
Pledge of Allegiance: Ashley Jackman, Strawberry Days Rodeo Royalty
Invocation: Jeff Acerson
PRESENTATION -
The Strawberry Days Royalty from Pleasant Grove will make a presentation to the City Council.
Nicole Wilson introduced herself as the new Miss Pleasant Grove, and extended an invitation to all present to attend the Strawberry Days Celebration in Pleasant Grove June 12th through June 18th. She invited her attendants to talk about events which will take place during the celebration.
Jocelyn Robinson gave information about the parade which will be held on Saturday, June 18th, as well as a pie eating contest.
Nicole Warner talked about Huck Finn Day, which includes many activities for children. She also talked about a baby contest which the Strawberry Days Royalty judges.
Kris Wade, first attendant in the Rodeo Royalty, talked about the rodeo. She stated that the rodeo is PRCA sanctioned and will have top competitors from around the country.
Ashley Jackman, second attendant in the Rodeo Royalty told about a “kid’s night” on Wednesday, June 15th, and a “family night” on Thursday, June 16th, with reduced rodeo ticket prices on those nights.
Ms. Wilson then presented a strawberry cheesecake to the Council. Mayor Acerson expressed appreciation to the ladies for taking time to attend the meeting.
MINUTES – The minutes of the regular meeting of May 17, 2005 were reviewed. The following corrections were made.
Page 10, Line 4: add the letter “D” to the word “MOVE”.
Page 11. Line 4: add the word “the” before the word “future”.
COUNCILMEMBER BATH MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 17, 2005 MEETING AS CORRECTED. COUNCILMEMBER BAYLESS SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
The minutes of the special meeting of May 19, 2005 were reviewed. No corrections were made.
COUNCILMEMBER BAYLESS MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MAY 19, 2005 AS WRITTEN. COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
OPEN SESSION – Citizen comments
Mayor Acerson asked if there were any citizens present to address an issue not on the agenda. Rod Rivers, a Lindon resident residing at 497 North and 800 East came forward. There were also several residents from the same area present in the audience. Mr. Rivers stated that he had been asked to represent his neighborhood in approaching the Council regarding improvements to the Squaw Hollow Park. According to Mr. Rivers, the park was scheduled for construction in 2003. Residents of the neighborhood are requesting that the park be completed as quickly as possible. He stated that a large number of children live in the neighborhood, and that they are in need of a safe place to play. Mr. Rivers also stated that the residents in the area would like to have some input regarding the design of the park. Mayor Acerson asked Mr. Dameron to address this issue.
Mr. Dameron informed Mr. Rivers that the City would welcome input from area residents regarding the design of the park. Mr. Dameron stated that it is the practice of the City to form a committee, which includes seven to ten residents from the area, to determine the park design. Mr. Dameron informed Mr. Rivers that there had been unforeseen problems in acquiring the property for the park, which will also serve as detention basin. Mr. Dameron stated that the property has now been acquired and that funds to complete the park are included in the 2005/2006 budget, and that construction should begin soon.
Mayor Acerson suggested that the residents present at the meeting move to the conference room in order to discuss who would be willing to participate on the committee, and give the Council those names before leaving the meeting. Mayor Acerson thanked Mr. Rivers for his time.
Mayor Acerson asked for further comment from the audience. Hearing none, he moved ahead with agenda items.
MAYORS COMMENTS/REPORT –
In the interest of time, Mayor Acerson gave no report at this meeting.
CONSENT AGENDA –
No items.
CURRENT BUSINESS –
1. Site Plan - Dunn Investments – Commercial Development. This is a request by Skip and Michelle Dunn for site plan approval for a strip commercial development in the CG zone at 575 North State Street. The Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions.
Curtis Miner and Skip Dunn approached the Council. Mr. Cowie gave an overview of the request, stating that the proposal is for a five unit strip mall near Wal-Mart on State Street.
Mr. Cowie stated that while there are required improvements to the car lot site, the use of the site is not changing. Therefore, the non-conforming use permit previously issued for the site will still be valid. Mr. Cowie stated that the site has been approved by UDOT. The site includes a drive through on the north side of the building. Mr. Cowie reviewed the recommendations set forth by the Planning Commission. The conditions include trees being planted on the island structures in the parking area, the aluminum trim on the front of the building will be a bronze color, and that cross easements will be provided to neighboring parcels.
Mr. Cowie also reviewed a problem which had been discovered regarding the property lines of the parcels. One property line would bisect the proposed building. Therefore, subdivision approval for relocation of the property line will be required. The Planning Commission recommended that the subdivision be finalized prior to issuing the building permit for the site. Mr. Cowie stated that the subdivision would be reviewed for approval by the Planning Commission on June 8th and would come to the City Council for approval on June 21st.
Councilmember Bath inquired as to landscaping. Mr. Dunn stated that there is an existing planter which will be upgraded, as well as the trees in the parking area recommended by the Planning Commission. Mr. Dunn also stated that he did not intend to continue the berm which is front of Wal-Mart property. Mr. Cowie informed him that a three foot berm is required. Mr. Dunn stated that the ground will be contoured to the three foot height, but will not be too high.
Councilmember Bath asked for clarification of the entrance points required by UDOT. Mr. Cowie reviewed the exact location of the entrance points. Councilmember Bath inquired as to the distance between the entrances. Mr. Cowie stated that the distance is between 110 and 120 feet. Councilmember Bath asked Captain Cody Cullimore of the Police Department if he felt there could be potential traffic concerns related to location of the entrances. Captain Cullimore stated that he would not anticipate any significant problems, and that potential problems would be further minimized with the installation of traffic control lights in the area. Mr. Dameron stated that the traffic light at 700 North is scheduled for installation in July.
Councilmember Carpenter asked for clarification on the Planning Commission requirement relating to the color of the aluminum. Councilmember Bayless stated that it had initially been proposed as a silver color, and that the Planning Commission had recommended the use of a bronze colored aluminum. Mr. Miner clarified that while the change had not been included in the drawing, the aluminum on the building would be a bronze color.
Councilmember Bayless noted that the Planning Commission had spent considerable time and worked very hard on this item.
COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY SKIP DUNN FOR A MULTIPLE UNIT STRIP MALL PROJECT AT 575 NORTH STATE STREET WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. TREES ARE PLANTED IN THE ISLAND AREAS AT THE CORNERS OF THE BUILDING
2. THE ALUMINUM ON THE ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING IS A BRONZE OR LIGHT BRONZE COLOR.
3. A CROSS EASEMENT TO NEIGHBORING PARCELS IS PROVIDED.
4. NO BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED UNTIL THE SUBDIVISION RE-PLAT IS COMPLETE.
COUNCILMEMBER BATH SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
2. Conditional Use Permit – Check City. This is a request by Curtis Miner, representing TOSH INC., for approval of a conditional use permit within the strip mall development proposed in item #1, in the CG zone at approximately 575 North State Street. The Planning Commission recommended approval with one condition.
Mr. Cowie gave a brief review of this item. He stated that the Planning Commission had recommended approval with the condition that the hours of operation remain at 9:00 a.m. – 9:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Mr. Cowie mentioned that there was one dissenting opinion from the Commission, which came from Commissioner Godfrey. He stated that he felt the Commission did not have sufficient information at this time to determine if the health, safety, and welfare of the community may be adversely affected by this business. No other major concerns were expressed by the Planning Commission. Councilmember Bayless noted that according to code, the City has indicated that this business is acceptable. Captain Cullimore stated that he has inquired of other communities with similar businesses as to the impact on the community. According to Captain Cullimore, there has been no significant negative effect on communities where similar businesses are located.
Mr. Dameron asked Mr. Dunn if he knew at this time what the neighboring businesses would consist of. Mr. Dunn stated that at the present time there will be a Super Cuts and a cell phone business.
Mr. Dameron commented that Councilmember Carpenter had expressed concern over the lighting of the signage. Mr. Miner stated that the sign would be a back lit cabinet sign. Councilmember Carpenter noted that the sign would have to meet specific size requirements. Mr. Miner stated that signage for the business will comply with the sign ordinance. Mayor Acerson stated that it is the intent of the City to allow signage which clearly identifies a business, but does not attract undo attention.
Councilmember Bayless observed that the Planning Commission had spent considerable time on this item, and that this business is allowed by City ordinance.
COUNCILMEMBER BAYLESS MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY CURTIS MINER FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CHECK CITY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
1. THAT THE HOURS OF OPERATION REMAIN AT 9:00 A.M. – 9:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY.
COUNCILMEMBER BATH SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
Councilmember Bath noted that he was willing to second the motion due to Mr. Miner’s willingness to work within city ordinance regarding signage.
3. Review and Approval – Country Cove Estates, Plat “B”. Mike Anderson, developer of Country Cove Estates, has asked that the Council review the conditions of approval for this subdivision which was approved during the May 17, 2005 meeting.
Mr. Cowie informed the Council that Mr. Anderson had requested to delay this item until later in the meeting. Mr. and Mrs. Smoot, who own property adjacent to the proposed development, have agreed to sell a parcel of land to Mr. Anderson in relation to this development, but had left the meeting to verify the location of certain boundary lines. Mr. Anderson requested to speak to the Council when Mr. and Mrs. Smoot return to the meeting.
COUNCILMEMBER BAYLESS MOVED TO DELAY ITEM THREE UNTIL LATER IN THE MEETING. COUNCILMEMBER BATH SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
4. Public Hearing – Alteration of non-conforming use – Glass Savers. The Council will hear public comment and possibly take action on this application for an alteration of a non-conforming use which requires a public hearing. The applicants, Dennis Gray and John Steiner, are requesting approval to construct an enclosed area in the rear of the building in CG zone located at 730 North State Street. The Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions.
COUNCILMEMBER BAYLESS MOVED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA FOR THIS MEETING. COUNCILMEMBER BATH SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Cowie introduced John Steiner to the Council, and stated that Mr. Steiner is a tenant in the building owned by Dennis Gray. Mr. Cowie stated that Mr. Steiner is requesting to add an enclosed storage area to the rear of the existing building. Mr. Cowie noted that the business is currently operating under a non – conforming use permit, due to the fact that it is located in the Commercial zone, and car repair facilities are not allowed in the Commercial zone under current ordinance. Mr. Cowie stated that Mr. Steiner has sent out the required notices to neighbors, and no response has been received by the City. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this item with a vote of 4 – 2. Mr. Cowie showed a photograph of the proposed structure, which is located in the rear of the building. Mr. Cowie stated that the roof of the structure has already been constructed, and that the parapet wall will continue the length of the building and will extend above the roofline of the building. He also noted that the razor wire on the top of the fence will be removed. Mr. Cowie commented on a staff concern that available parking for the business did not meet the requirements of the code. However, the Planning Commission felt that the required parking would be excessive due to the type of business conducted on the site.
Mr. Steiner commented that Mr. Gray has been making an effort to clean up the area at the rear of the building, and has made significant improvements during the past year. Mr. Steiner also noted that since he occupied the building in August of 2004, he has made landscaping improvements to the front of the building. Mr. Steiner stated that as the rear area of the building is cleared, he plans to lay a gravel base for use as overflow parking. Mr. Steiner clarified that a large portion of his glass repair business is conducted off site. He stated that the largest portion of his on site business is conducted on Saturdays, but that repairs are generally completed in about an hour, and that he does not typically store cars in relation to his business.
Councilmember Bayless asked Mr. Steiner if Mr. Gray is currently running the auto repair business. Mr. Steiner stated that Mr. Gray has recently hired a manager for the business. The new manager is planning to attract more maintenance type work, such as tune ups, and fewer complicated lengthy repair jobs, which will lessen the need for storage parking.
Councilmember Carpenter asked Mr. Steiner if by adding the storage structure, his business would be expanded in any way. Mr. Steiner clarified that the structure will be used for storage only. Councilmember Carpenter also asked Mr. Cowie if the current storage area is in compliance with the existing ordinance for disabled cars. Mr. Cowie stated that to his knowledge, there is not a specific ordinance relating storage of vehicles at repair shops. Councilmember Carpenter stated that if a site obscuring fence is required, the Council could require it to be installed. Mayor Acerson agreed that a stipulation could be made that the storage area be in compliance with existing ordinance.
Councilmember Bath commented that he was struggling with the idea of allowing a business operating under a non-conforming use permit to expand. Councilmember Bayless asked Mr. Cowie if a glass repair business would be allowable in the Commercial zone. Mr. Cowie stated that the City presently has no listed area for glass repair businesses. Councilmember Carpenter clarified the intent of his question earlier regarding expansion of the business. He noted that the business is not expanding, but rather trying to operate more efficiently. Councilmember Bath expressed concern over the precedent that may be set by allowing the expansion. Mr. Dameron stated that there was another business located on the site prior to the arrival of Mr. Steiner. Councilmember Bath asked if the previous business had been a similar type. Mr. Steiner stated that it was an auto body business. Mayor Acerson observed that eventually, the business owned by Mr. Gray will be replaced, but felt that it would not be appropriate to hinder an owner from doing business as efficiently as possible. Councilmember Carpenter stated that he would share Councilmember Bath’s concerns if the addition would increase business, but felt that would not be the outcome.
Councilmember Bath inquired as to whether the storage structure would meet code. Mr. Cowie informed him that inspections would be conducted to ensure that the structure is in compliance.
Mr. Cowie had reviewed the code as it relates to storage of vehicles and found that up to ten cars could be stored on the site, but that a site obscuring fence would be required. Councilmember Carpenter noted that the code does not specify the height of the fence, but that the photographs of the site indicate that the parapet wall which is proposed will be of sufficient height to obscure the view of the storage area.
Mayor Acerson asked for public comment regarding this request. Hearing none, he called for a motion to close the public hearing on this item.
COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR AN ALTERATION OF A NON CONFORMING USE PERMIT FOR DENNIS GRAY. COUNCILMEMBER BATH SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
COUNCILMEMBER BAYLESS MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY DENNIS GRAY AND JOHN STEINER FOR AN ALTERATION OF NON-CONFORMING USE FOR ADDITION OF THE PROPOSED STORAGE AREA WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. THAT THE BLOCK WALL CONTINUE THE LENGTH OF THE BUILDING.
2. THAT THE PARAPET WALL EXTEND ABOVE THE ROOF LINE.
3. THAT THE RAZOR WIRE ON THE FENCE BE REMOVED.
4. THAT A BUILDING PERMIT BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY PRIOR TO CONTINUING CONSTRUCTION OF THE STORAGE BUILDING.
5. THAT EXCESS VEHICLES BE REMOVED FROM THE REAR OF THE BUILDING AND THE AREA IS CLEANED TO ELIMINATE A VERMIN REFUGE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
During the motion, Councilmember Bath noted that he was still unsure about allowing the expansion of the building. Councilmember Bayless explained that there was a potential benefit of having the area of the business cleaned up and eliminating some of the existing problems with the site. Councilmember Bath agreed with Councilmember Bayless’ reasoning, and agreed to the approval.
COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER MOVED TO CLOSE THE REMAINING PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RETURN TO THEM LATER IN THE MEETING. COUNCILMEMBER BATH SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
Country Cove Estates
At this time, Mike Anderson and Mr. and Mrs. Hinckley were prepared to address the Council. Mr. Anderson is responding to a condition of approval placed on this development by the City Council to have some communication with the Smoot family, who own property adjacent to the proposed development, regarding their feelings concerning the development and any negative effect they feel it may have on them in relation to future development of the property they own. Mr. Anderson informed the Council that he and Mr. Hinckley had reached an agreement regarding the sale of the parcel of land located on the east side on the Hinckley home. Mr. Anderson invited Mr. Hinckley to comment. Mr. Hinckley stated that while there were still details in the transaction which needed to be worked out, they were agreeable to the sale.
Mr. Cowie presented an overhead view of the area. Mr. Hinckley demonstrated the realignment of the property lines. Councilmember Carpenter inquired as to what the result would be if the sale of the parcel to Mr. Anderson did not go through. Mr. Hinckley stated that they would like to have approval for a flag lot on the parcel if the sale failed. He observed that without the approval for the flag lot, the parcel would be landlocked. Mr. Anderson commented on another possible access to the lot. Mr. Hinckley stated that while they would agree to that access, it would create a frontage of only sixty feet, and would therefore not meet code. Councilmember Carpenter informed Mr. Hinckley that a flag lot could not be approved for the site at this time.
Councilmember Bayless suggested that Mr. Anderson and Mr. Hinckley finalize the sale of the property and return to the Council at a later meeting. Mr. Anderson noted that the written contract would be completed the following day. Mr. Hinckley expressed concern over the completion of the transaction if something were to happen to Mr. Anderson and he was not able to fulfill the terms of the contract. Mr. Anderson stated that he is not concerned about closing on the property, and that he has available resources to fulfill the terms of the contract. Mr. Anderson asked the Council if the contract is in place by the next regular City Council meeting on June 21st if the condition would be met. Councilmember Carpenter stated that if the contract is in force it would meet the requirement. Mrs. Hinckley expressed concern over what the outcome would be if the terms of the contract with Mr. Anderson are not fulfilled. Councilmember Bayless stated that it is not in the authority of the Council to guarantee the terms of the contract. Councilmember Carpenter suggested including language in the contract which would address a specific outcome if the terms of the contract are not met, such a stop build clause or a damage clause. Mayor Acerson stated that he was hopeful that the Hinckley’s were aware of potential problems, and could address them in the best interest of both parties. Mr. Anderson will review this development with the Council again at a later date.
5. Public Hearing – Amendments to the City’s Sign Ordinance – Title 18 of the Lindon City Code. The Council will hear public comment and possibly act to approve amendments to Title 18 – Sign Ordinance of the Lindon City Code.
COUNCILMEMBER BAYLESS MOVED TO RE-OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA FOR THIS MEETING. COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Cowie turned the time over to John Martineau, Planning Intern, to present a power point presentation he had prepared which depicted different elements of signage which were under consideration by the City Council for revisions. Mr. Cowie informed the Council that the major issues which needed to be addressed were LED type signs, and where they would be appropriate, as well as an appropriate size. Also under consideration is the use of awnings as part of signage, and the allowable size of wall signs.
Mr. Martineau stated that the presentation he has prepared addresses these elements of signage, and includes comparisons of different LED type signs, awning signs, and wall signs. Mr. Martineau first reviewed photographs of various LED type signs located in Utah Valley and discussed the approximate square footage of each example.
Mr. Martineau then showed a variety of awnings in used on businesses in the valley, which demonstrate different types and amounts of lettering. Mr. Martineau noted that while traveling around the valley to obtain the pictures, he had observed that many of the awnings used on building were constructed of plastic type materials, and were also back lit. Mr. Cowie commented that the consensus of the Planning Commission was that back lit awnings should not be allowed, as they are not in character with the image Lindon is trying to create. Mr. Cowie stated that the Planning Commission was unable to come to consensus regarding the placement of lettering on awnings. Councilmember Carpenter felt it was arguable whether some of the photographs depicted awnings or signs that hang over the sidewalk. Mr. Cowie observed that one goal is to better define awnings, but that it is difficult to do. Mr. Cowie commented that some businesses do not have sufficient wall space to provide adequate provide adequate signage.
Mr. Martineau then presented images of wall signs which had been digitally altered to depict various percentages of wall space. Mr. Cowie stated that wall signs had been reviewed extensively by the Planning Commission. Mr. Cowie has also met with Mr. Kirk Brimley of YESCO. Mr. Brimley is also Chairman of the Board of the Utah Sign Commission. Mr. Brimley has furnished the City with a book regarding signage, as well as discussing signage issues with Mr. Cowie, the Planning Commission, and the City Council. According to the results of extensive research, Mr. Cowie has determined that the City can not require and alteration to a registered trade mark. In addition, signage must be adequate size so as to be readable from the street and clearly identify the business. The Council discussed various suggestions for calculating the allowable size of signage.
Mr. Cowie then reviewed recommendations of the Planning Commission as follows:
1. That neon lighting should not be allowed, except open and closed signs, which can not exceed three square feet
2. No plastic type or back lit awnings.
3. Balloon signs, such as inflatable gorillas, will only be allowed for thirty calendar days per year for special events such as a grand opening. It was clarified that blow up type signs could be used for a total of thirty days per year, not thirty days per event.
4. Clearly define changeable copy, mechanical, manual, and electronic signs.
5. Requirement of signage for home based businesses should be clarified.
6. The use of statue structures (such as horses) in signage will be counted toward the overall size of signage.
Mr. Cowie went on to say that any sign that is not specifically listed in the ordinance could be reviewed by the Planning Commission for approval. Mr. Cowie stated that it is difficult to classify all signs, but that there should be general aesthetic standards, and that monument signs which include earth tone colors will be encouraged. Councilmember Carpenter noted that he would like to see some language in the code which will address allowable colors in signage. Mayor Acerson observed that colors for logos can not be restricted. Councilmember Carpenter suggested the possibility of limiting the maximum allowable percentage of signage which can be used for the logo. He made the specific recommendation that if signage includes colors chosen by the business the maximum allowable size could be five percent of wall space, while if earth tone colors, black, and white are used, ten percent of wall space could be used as signage. Councilmember Bayless noted that there would be a potential that those restrictions could be challenged very easily.
Mayor Acerson asked Mr. Brimley to comment. Mr. Brimley confirmed that the City can not require alteration of registered trademarks. He stated that the purpose of trademarks is to create continuity for the business, and will guide people to something familiar when they are in an unfamiliar area. Councilmember Bath noted that the City is not suggesting altering trademarks, but is considering limiting the allowable size of trademark logos. Mr. Brimley also discussed safety issues relating to signage. He observed that the lettering on street signs was four inches at one time, it is now six inches, and will soon be eight inches. Mr. Brimley commented that people are busy, and are moving faster than in previous times. According to Mr. Brimley, this creates a need for lettering on signage to be easily and quickly read and identified. He noted that set back from the street has an effect on the readability of the sign from the street. Mayor Acerson asked Mr. Brimley if there area specific guidelines that specify the size of lettering based on distance from the street. Mr. Brimley stated that he has that information, and will make it available to the City. He commented that in general, lettering in high traffic areas needs to be larger. Mr. Brimley also commented on the use of message center signs, and that it is necessary for the copy on these signs to be large enough to be easily read at a glance. Mayor Acerson inquired as to whether the City has the ability to set its’ own standards. Mr. Brimley stated that the City can set standards within guidelines, but that it is necessary to have some basis for the standards other than personal opinion. Mayor Acerson inquired as to standards set by the Government. Mr. Brimley stated that the Small Business Administration has specific standards. Mr. Dameron asked what the standards set by the SBA include. Mr. Brimley stated that according the SBA, minimum lettering size on the freeway corridor is twelve to fourteen inches, noting that it is necessary for drivers to be able to read the sign at a glance. The Council discussed that the current allowable size for electronic signs on the freeway corridor is 3x12 feet. Mr. Brimley felt that this was not an adequate size for signage in the freeway corridor. Mayor Acerson observed that it would be necessary to have some basis for size restrictions. Mr. Brimley commented that a common misconception is that electronic signs cause a distraction for drivers and can create a potential safety concern. According to Mr. Brimley, driver awareness is actually improved when traveling in the area of an electronic sign. Mayor Acerson stated that if Mr. Brimley had any statistics which substantiate that claim, it would be helpful in creating standards. Mr. Brimley stated that he has information and will forward it to the City.
At this time, Mayor Acerson called for public comment. Steve Bown, owner of Skyline Productions, commented that his business, which is located near the freeway, is difficult for clients to locate. According to Mr. Bown, he frequently receives calls from potential clients who are unable to locate his business. Mr. Bown is requesting a pole type sign near the freeway which instructs customers as to which exit to take. The proposed sign would also be visible after exiting the freeway and would assist customers in determining the location of the business. Mr. Bown stated that he has been working with YESCO on the design of the sign. Mayor Acerson pointed out that the proposed sign does not meet current ordinance, and will require changes prior to approval. Mr. Bown stated that he will agree to the limitations set by the Council, but is requesting direction on design standards which will be approved.
Mr. Dameron commented on the reader board sign located at the Airstream business near the freeway. He observed that the message on the board moves to slowly, and drivers are not able to read the complete message as they drive by. Mr. Brimley noted that this is an operational mistake on the part of the company, and that it is necessary to monitor the speed and size of the message carefully in order to optimize their effectiveness. According to Mr. Brimley, up to 30% of the business conducted by McDonalds can be attributed to signage. Mr. Brimley pointed out that tax revenues are equally important to a city as are aesthetics.
Discussion continued regarding specific size limitations for wall signs, as well as the use of awnings in signage. Also discussed was the allowable percentage of window signs. Mayor Acerson commented that when window signs are overused, it creates excessive clutter. Councilmember Carpenter suggested that window signs should be included in the overall total of signage allowed for a business. Councilmember Bayless commented that she felt monument signs should not be included in the percentage requirements for signage. Councilmember Carpenter expressed agreement.
Councilmember Bath brought up the issue of seasonal window signage, such as Christmas decorations which are painted on the window. The general consensus of the Council was that if the seasonal decorations did not include business information, they would not be considered signage, but seasonal decoration, and would not be regulated according to the sign ordinance.
Mr. Cowie reviewed the main areas of revision to the ordinance, which were allowable size of wall signs, use of LED type signs, and the use of awnings as signage. He encouraged the Council to drive along the I-15 corridor and compare the look of signs in other cities to help in determining preferences for Lindon. Mr. Cowie commented that the Planning Commission had discussed at length the allowable size of LED type signs.
Mr. Dameron noted that the Planning Commission had previously considered revision to the allowable size for monument type signs. Mr. Cowie stated that following review, the Planning Commission had determined that the 14 foot size currently allowed was not excessive, and felt no revision was necessary. Councilmember Carpenter noted that all involved parties had been working hard on this issue, and felt that the general direction of the revisions was appropriate. Mayor Acerson commented that he had felt a real sense of cooperation during the discussion.
COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER MOVED TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDMENTS TO THE LINDON CITY SIGN ORDINANCE UNTIL THE MEETING ON JUNE 21, 2005. COUNCILMEMBER BAYLESS SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
6. Public Hearing – Proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2005/2006. The City Council will hear public comment concerning the proposed city budget for fiscal year 2005/2006, including the allocation of revenue from the water, sewer, and other enterprise funds to the general fund. One public work session and two Budget Committee meetings have been held where the budget issues were discussed. Tonight, staff will present the issues associated with the proposed budget, including changes to the city-wide fee schedule and utility billing policy, and the Council will direct staff on each issue. The public hearing for budget adoption is scheduled for June 21, 2005.
Kristen Colson, Lindon City Finance Director/Treasurer, presented an outline of the proposed budget for fiscal year 2005/2006. She reviewed changes to the Fee Schedule, which include a decrease in the cost of garbage collection, a fee for the “Leaves of Lindon” books, utility sign up and shut off fees, and a $25 fee for signs which do not require an on-site inspection. Ms. Colson noted that this fee had previously been higher, but staff had determined that fees were higher than necessary. Ms. Colson also pointed out that residents who rent homes will no longer have the utility accounts in their names. The utility accounts will be placed in the name of the property owner. Ms. Colson reviewed specifics of the utility shut off policy which will be put into affect. She noted that the policy is consistent with existing ordinance, but that the City had become to lenient in utility shut off practices. Ms. Colson also commented on a deposit which will be charged to residents who file bankruptcy. They will be charged a $250 deposit in order to continue receiving utility service. The intent is to ensure that utility bills will be paid in a timely manner. It was also noted that the annexation fee will be eliminated and replaced by an annexation application fee.
Ms. Colson then covered specific items listed in the annual budget. They were discussed as follows:
1. Code Enforcement Officer. This position will be responsible for code enforcement and will also assist with building inspections. The impact to the budget will be approximately $58,000 per year.
2. Public Works Vactor Truck. The vactor truck currently owned by the City is ten years old. The used vactor truck will be traded in on a new truck, which will create a net expense of approximately $180,000 to the City. This will be paid at approximately $66,000 annually over a three year period, at approximately 5% interest. Mr. Dameron noted that these figures are estimates, and the trade in a purchase will be opened for bid.
3. Employee Health Insurance Benefit. Ms. Colson noted that she was unable to obtain bids from other insurance companies. If the health insurance plan offered by the City to employees were maintained it would create a cost increase of approximately 19% to the City. City employees were given an option of reduced coverage at a lower cost to the City as well as the employees. Employees voted in favor of the option, which create a cost increase of 7% to the City. This will create an increased cost of $22,000 to the budget. Mr. Dameron commented that other cities have experienced increases of 20%-30% in the cost of health care coverage. Mr. Dameron commended City employees on their willingness to share the burden of the increased cost.
4. Cost of living and merit raises. Ms. Colson stated that the CPI was used in determining the proposed amount of cost of living raises. She stated that other cities in the area had been surveyed regarding their method of determining cost of living raises. The survey indicated that while exact amounts of raises varied slightly, most cities use the federal CPI to determine cost of living pay increases. The proposed cost of living pay increases creates a cost of $72,500 in the budget. Mr. Dameron inquired as to how the Council felt about this amount. Councilmember Bayless noted that she is very impressed with City employees, and felt that the City needs to support the employees and let them know that they are valued.
5. Salary Survey. Ms. Colson stated that eight cities had been surveyed regarding pay for positions similar to those in Lindon. The survey indicated that, in general, the pay scale used by Lindon City is competitive with neighboring communities. However, adjustments were recommended for several positions, including moving the Building Inspector to a higher range, Finance Director to a higher step, Superintendents to a higher range, and a pay increase for the Mayor and City Council. It was noted that Lindon City currently offers the lowest pay in the survey area for the Mayor and City Councilmembers. Compensation for the Mayor would increase to $850 per month, the Councilmember who attends Planning Commission meeting would increase to $550 per month, and all other Councilmembers would increase to $500 per month. The Council was in agreement with all suggested changes. Councilmember Carpenter noted that, in general, Mayor and Councilmember positions should be regarded as public service, but individuals should not be precluded from service due to lack of compensation.
6. General Fund breakdown. This summary indicates that approximately 25% of the general fund is used for public safety. Mayor Acerson indicated that 25% is typical in other cities as well.
7. Revenues. Ms. Colson indicated that 75% of the revenue generated by the City is tax revenue. She also reviewed the city wide budget by fund.
8. Capital Expenditures. The proposed capital expenditure budget for 2005/2006 was proposed at approximately 17.8 million dollars. Mr. Dameron noted that when he began working for Lindon City ten years ago, capital expenditures were approximately 3 million dollars. He commented on the growth in the City in that period of time. Ms. Colson noted that capital expenditures include improvements to the cemetery and government buildings, construction of 700 North Street and 200 South Street, as well as park projects. Mr. Dameron asked specifically about Squaw Hollow Park, which had been addressed earlier in the meeting. Though Squaw Hollow was not specifically listed as a project, Mayor Acerson stated that there is money allocated that could be used to complete the park.
Mayor Acerson called for public comment regarding the proposed budget for fiscal year 2005/2006. Hearing none, he called for a motion to close the public hearing.
COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA FOR THIS MEETING. COUNCILMEMBER BATH SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
COUNCILMEMBER BAYLESS MOVED TO ADJOURN THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING TEMPORARILY AND CONVENE THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AT 10:16 P.M. COUNCILMEMBER BATH SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
BOARDMEMBER CARPENTER MOVED TO ADJOURN THE LINDON CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CONVENE THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AT 10:16 P.M. BOARDMEMBER BAYLESS SECONDED THE MOTION ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
BOARDMEMBER BAYLESS MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND RECONVENE THE LINDON CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 10:26 P.M. BOARDMEMBER BATH SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
7. Review and Action - Sale of Real Estate Parcel. The Council will consider the sale of a small parcel of property located at approximately 190 South 1200 East to Phil Windley, the adjacent property owner. According to city ordinance, this parcel is not large enough to be considered as “significant.” An appraisal was completed and other property owners in the area were contacted.
Mr. Dameron explained the Mr. Windley has approached the City regarding purchase of a small parcel of land located near the entrance to the Canberra subdivision at approximately 190 South and 1200 East. The utility companies have been contacted and have indicated that some access will be required to utility easements. Mr. Windley has agreed to allow access. Mr. Windley has indicated that the existing sidewalk will be removed and replaced with a combination of curb, gutter, and sidewalk. The size of the parcel which has been proposed is 6,960 square feet, and will be sold to Mr. Windley at a cost of $1.25 per square foot. This creates a sale price of approximately $8,700 dollars for the parcel.
Mr. Dameron suggested that the City maintain a three foot strip of ground at the rear of the sidewalk which would be maintained by the City. This would eliminate the placement of the six foot fence next to the sidewalk. Public Works Director Don Peterson has indicated that City crews would be available to maintain the three foot strip. If the City maintains the three foot strip, the price of the parcel would be reduced accordingly.
Mayor Acerson called for further discussion. Hearing none, he called for a motion.
COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE SALE OF THE PARCEL OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 190 SOUTH 1200 EAST TO PHIL WINDLEY AT A COST OF $1.25 PER SQUARE FOOT. COUNCILMEMBER BAYLESS SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
8. Review and Action – Agreement with Orem City for 200 South Reconstruction – Joint Project. Lindon City and Orem City are jointly reconstructing sections of 200 South Street, the boundary between the cities. Rather than have two contractors working in the same vicinity, it seemed prudent to allow Orem City to bid out the entire project and Lindon pay for only its portion of the improvements. Ratification of this agreement will effectuate that arrangement.
Mr. Dameron pointed out that this agreement had been discussed in the Budget Committee meeting, and that he had contacted Councilmember Bath to make him aware of the terms of the agreement. Councilmember Carpenter asked if any elements of the agreement had changed. Mr. Dameron stated that the agreement had not change, and that this action is for ratification of the agreement. Mayor Acerson asked for further comments or discussion. Hearing none, he called for a motion.
COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER MOVED TO RATIFY THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN LINDON CITY AND OREM CITY FOR THE JOINT RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT OF 200 NORTH STREET. COUNCILMEMBER BATH SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Dameron commented on storm drain construction which will be occurring in the same area as the road reconstruction. Orem officials had expressed concern that there may be a conflict if two contractors were working in the same area. Mr. Dameron has notified the contractor who will be doing the reconstruction of 200 North Street that bids for the storm drain project will open next week, and has invited them to bid on the project. The Council will approve the bid award for the project at the regular meeting on June 21st.
9. Review and Action – BFI Assignment Letter. BFI Waste Systems of North America, Inc. is requesting City Council approval of the assignment of their waste collection contract with Lindon City to Allied Waste Services on North America, LLC, their parent company.
Mr. Dameron informed the Council that BFI changing their name to Allied Waste, and has requested that the Council formally recognize the change. Mayor Acerson asked if the change could create the possibility of them voiding the current contract with Lindon City. Mr. Dameron stated that Allied Waste is the parent company of BFI, and that terms of the contract are expected to remain the same.
COUNCILMEMBER BATH MOVED TO APPROVE THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE THEIR WASTE COLLECTION CONTRACT WITH BFI WASTE SYSTEMS TO ALLIED WASTE SERVICES, WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT REMAINING THE SAME. COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
10. Review and Action – UTA Agreement – Pipeline Crossings. This proposed agreement between UTA and Lindon City pertains to the pipeline crossings necessary for the 700 North street project as it crosses the railroad tracks west of Geneva Road.
Mr. Dameron noted that this item had been mentioned at the meeting on May 17th, but is being presented at this meeting for action. The agreement gives the City the authority to go under existing pipelines rail lines for installation of additional sewer, water, and storm drain lines. Mr. Dameron also noted that the required fee will be paid in a lump sum, rather than making annual payments.
COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER MOVED TO APPROVE THE PIPELINE CROSSING AGREEMENT WITH UTA. COUNCILMEMBER BAYLESS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE VOTE WAS RECORDED AS FOLLOWS:
COUNCILMEMBER BATH AYE
COUNCILMEMBER BAYLESS AYE
COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER AYE
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY WITH TWO ABSENT.
COUNCIL REPORTS
WATER, SEWER, SOLID WASTE, HOUSING CONSORTIUM –
Councilmember Hatch was not present at the meeting.
TRAILS, PLANNING, ZONING, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS, ADMINISTRATION –
Councilmember Bayless inquired as to a report she had received from a citizen that there had been flooding on the east side of Lindon. Mr. Dameron stated that there had been a claim regarding flood damage at the Larsen residence on 400 North. URMMA is investigating the claim. Councilmember Bayless also noted that another citizen had expressed to her that the development on State Street was beginning to look as though there is a theme to the buildings.
Mr. Dameron commented that he had met with the parties involved in the Lindon Pumping Company regarding improvements in that area. Mr. Dameron stated that the city will remove the fence and the building, and that a metal plate will be placed over the well until such time as the parties involved request that it be sealed. In turn, the City will be given the right of way necessary to complete road improvements. Mr. Dameron pointed out that this will allow widening of the intersection.
PUBLIC SAFETY, COURT, BUILDING INSPECTIONS –
Councilmember Bath noted that he was impressed with the article written by Captain Cody Cullimore of the Police Department for the June Newsletter.
PARKS, RECREATION, ENGINEERING, LINDON FAIR, NEWSLETTER –
Councilmember Anthony was not present at the meeting.
GENERAL PLAN, STREETS & SIDEWALKS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS –
Councilmember Carpenter had no items to report.
ADMINISTRATORS REPORT –
Councilmember Bayless mentioned that she had been contacted by Character Connection to serve as the Council Representative for that organization, but had not been contacted since she had agreed to serve in that capacity. She stated that she does not feel a need to participate, but is willing to do so if it would be advantageous. Councilmember Carpenter inquired as to the success of Character Connection in achieving their goals. Mr. Dameron noted that it would be difficult to measure the success of the program, but that it has a positive impact on the community.
Mr. Dameron pointed out that each of the Councilmembers had received a letter inviting them to attend a meeting with Soren Simonsen of CRS Architects to take input for establishing design guidelines for State Street. Mr. Dameron informed the Council that Mr. Cowie and Mr. Martineau had sent out 100 letters to residents inviting them to attend. The meeting will be held June 16th at 7:00 p.m. at the City Center.
Engineering Coordination Meeting will be held Wednesday, June 15th, and will involve Councilmember Carpenter and Councilmember Bayless.
The joint field trip for the City Council and Planning Commission to tour the development in Herriman is scheduled for June 15th at 6:00 p.m.
The Council reviewed the project tracking list and requested to review the proposed preschool to address any safety concerns with the site.
Councilmember Bath requested information regarding the proposed annexation of property on the west side of the City. Mr. Dameron stated that the City attorney is working on the agreement, but has many other demands on his time as well.
Mr. Dameron informed the Council that there are currently 278 recycling accounts, and that the cans are emptied every two weeks rather than every week.
All property for the construction of 700 North Street has been transferred to the City. The bond for the project closed on June 1st, and construction should begin in approximately two weeks.
Mr. Dameron verified that Councilmembers will be available to meet for the regular meeting on July 5th. Councilmember Carpenter, Councilmember Anthony, and Mayor Acerson will all be out of town for the June 21st meeting. Councilmember Hatch is scheduled at Mayor Pro-Tem. Mr. Dameron will contact Councilmember Hatch to ensure a quorum will be in attendance at the meeting.
COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER MOVED TO APPROVE THE PAY VOUCHERS. COUNCILMEMBER BATH SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURN –
COUNCILMEMBER BAYLESS MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 11:05 P.M. COUNCILMEMBER CARPENTER SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
APPROVED – June 21, 2005
_____________________________________
Ott H. Dameron, City Administrator/Recorder
___________________________
Jeff Acerson, Mayor
|
|
|
