|
|
Home » City Government » Planning Commission » Minutes Archive; 2000 - 2002 » Planning Commission Minutes 2002 » October 23, 2002
October 23, 2002
The Lindon City Planning Commission held a regularly scheduled meeting on October 23, 2002 at 7:00 p.m. in the Lindon City Center Council Chambers at 100 North State Street, Lindon, Utah.
Conducting: Jim Peters, Acting Chairman
Invocation: Marilyn Simister, Commissioner
PRESENT
Jim Peters, Acting Chairman
Ron Anderson, Commissioner
Bruce Carpenter, Commissioner
Marilyn Simister, Commissioner
Dustin Sweeten, Commissioner
Kevin Smith, Planning Director
Venla Gubler, Administrative Clerk
Robert Hammond, Planning Intern
ABSENT
Loren Morse, Chairman
Lori Atchison, Commissioner
Lindsey Bayless, Councilmember
The Meeting began at 7:04 P.M.
1. MINUTES
Review of the Minutes of October 9, 2002.
The Minutes of the regular meeting of October 9, 2002 were reviewed. It was decided to incorporate the changes and review them again at the next meeting.
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mr. Buck Robinson of KBR Building Systems presented a proposal to use a new building system for the new Graphik building on 1400 West in Lindon. Mr. Smith explained that the industrial ordinance does not allow metal buildings, even though this system is embossed to look like stucco. He added that what Mr. Robinson is looking for is a possible ordinance amendment to incorporate this construction into the code.
The Commissioners asked Mr. Robinson about the appearance, history and endurance of the product and system. Mr. Robinson replied that the warranty for the process is in the 30 year range and that it has been used successfully in Alaska for energy savings. Commissioner Anderson commented that the pictured building Mr. Robinson had distributed to the Commissioners “looked nice.”
Mr. Smith observed that staff has no objections to allowing this system to be used. He suggested, however, that the Commissioners be specific in changing the code. Commissioner Carpenter asked if there were other city codes that could be used for an example. He commented that he didn’t want the City to appear to favor one process or building over another. He suggested that a reference to a generic building process may be sufficient. Commissioner Peters suggested using the ICBO terms for writing the code amendment. The location of the new building for Graphik was disclosed.
3. NEW BUSINESS (Reports by Commissioners)
There was no new business reported.
4. TIM CLYDE - 239 WEST 400 NORTH - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT & ZONE CHANGE - PUBLIC HEARING
This is a request to change the General Plan land use designation for this property from Low Density Residential to Commercial and the zoning from R1-20 to General Commercial. The City Council would like the Planning Commission to review this application again as a result of new information presented to the Council by neighbors of the project.
COMMISSIONER CARPENTER MOVED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIONER SIMISTER SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Smith reminded the Commissioners that this item had been reviewed before. He displayed an area map and informed the Commission that the applicant is requesting a zone change from R1-20 to Commercial. At the last Commission meeting, the Commissioners required the applicant to give notice to the neighbors of the pending Council review of this application. The Council heard the input from the neighborhood and remanded the item back to the Commission to hear the concerns.
Acting Chairman Peters asked some questions about the access to 400 North and its proposed location in relation to other homes and businesses in the area. Commissioner Sweeten suggested that the neighbors be heard first. Creig Fryer of 676 North Locust told the Commission that he had originally bought this property for investment purposes. If this sale to Mr. Clyde is not consummated, he is considering an R1 Overlay project on the residential portion. Mr. Smith agreed that this was a possible future for this lot if the zoning stays in the residential designation. The size of the lot may allow 3-4 units if all other criteria for that district are met. The R2 Overlay ordinance was explained for the neighbors present. Mrs. Dorothy Sisam expressed concern about having multifamily housing in the neighborhood, but she was also concerned about the change to commercial and the types of businesses that may locate there. Commissioner Anderson explained that the commercial ordinance allows a wide variety of commercial uses.
Mr. Bill Harper of 200 West 400 North commented that his property values have been reduced considerably because of the bus garage. He asked if he could rezone his property also to allow his construction company to relocate to Lindon. The Commissioners discussed the proposal with Mr. Harper. It was pointed out that the original demarcation line between the zones was an arbitrary 550 feet from the State Street centerline. When the General Plan had been updated, the line between the zones had been moved to conform to existing property lines.
Acting Chairman Peters asked Mr. Fryer how long he had owned the property. Mr. Fryer replied 15 years. Acting Chairman Peters pointed out that this parcel had been partially zoned commercial under the old 550 feet rule and had been rezoned totally residential during the recent zoning and General Plan update. He addressed Mr. Harper and observed that the construction company is not allowed in a commercial zone either, only the office. Mr. Carson’s construction company was discussed. Commissioner Anderson noted that Mr. Carson’s business is a pre-existing condition.
Commissioner Sweeten observed that a good portion of Mr. Fryer’s property was within the commercial zone previously. Mr. Harper commented that his property is directly across the street from Mr. Fryer’s nd and claimed discrimination if he is not allowed to do the same. Acting Chairman Peters commented that this is the reason that the City decided to revise the zoning to follow property lines. Mr. Harper observed that he would like to see the Fryers get what they deserve receive what is owed to them, but he would like to have the same option. Mrs. Debbie Harper commented that this would only leave three homes in this block between State Street and Locust Avenue within the residential zone. She expressed concern about an access for semis across from her home and the noise created by saws cutting the fence panels. Mr. Mike Harper agreed that the level of noise added to that of the bus garage may be excessive.
Mr. Bill Harper also agreed with the noise complaint. He felt that his property would be worth even less because he would be unable to “find someone to put up with the Carson’s construction business, the bus garage, and now this” new addition to the neighborhood. He added that traffic is heavy on 400 North, and people are parking in front of his home blocking his driveway to access the pizza business on the corner. He pointed out that another danger was the children walking to school because of district cuts in bussing. Acting Chairman Peters observed that he could hear the bus garage intercom at his home. Mr. Mike Harper commented that they had learned to deal with the bus garage, but this is an additional source of noise and traffic. He contended that if this parcel is zoned commercial, eventually it may have a gas station or convenience market there to compound the problems. He expressed the opinion that he would rather have dwellings.
Mr. Jared Hunt, real estate agent for Tim Clyde, informed the audience and Commission that the rezoning application does not impact the placement and orientation of the buildings proposed for State Street. The business will still be there. All this affects is the access to 400 North. He suggested that the Commission could place noise restrictions on the business, but observed that all fitting and cutting would be contained within the warehouse, not in the open. Mr. Mike Harper observed that the garage doors would sometimes be open, especially in the summer. He expressed concern about stacking of pallets. Mr. Hunt replied that there would be only one load per week coming in the access from 400 North and all storage would be within the warehouse. Mr. Hunt again stressed that regardless what the outcome of the zoning issue is, the plans for the State Street frontage is not changing. He added that Mr. Clyde is trying to be a good neighbor and address the concerns of the residents. Mrs. Sisam asked if Mr. Clyde’s plans would change if he did not get access to 400 North. Mr. Hunt replied that the road was a convenience, but not a necessity.
Mr. Rick Nay suggested as an unbiased observer present on another issue, that is very unfair to make the Fryers stick with the residential zone. He felt that the Commission should consider Mr. Harper’s suggestion to make the area commercial. He observed that the City is growing and traffic and noise will only get worse. He commented that the residents, city and developers work together for the future. He also suggested that the homes there will not blend with future development along State Street and they should consider a change to commercial.
Acting Chairman Peters asked if sawing light manufacturing was allowed in the commercial zone. Mr. Smith replied that no application had been received by the City for a business on this site yet, but that the City looks at these issues based on the primary activity of the business and on a case by case basis. Mrs. Debbie Harper commented that the backs of offices are typically “messy.” She asked how Mr. Clyde could guarantee a limit of only one truck per week, because his business is growing or he would not be looking for a new site. Mr. Bill Harper commented that if he is allowed the same opportunity then he won’t be losing value and the Fryers will benefit also. He observed that their neighborhood has been reduced to three voices and that these homes are being overrun. Acting Chairman Peters explained that the Commission is required to only consider valid, substantiated arguments and cannot base their decisions on “public clamor.”
Mrs. Helen Harper expressed concern over the deterioration of the neighborhood. She observed that if things get too bad, her sons would move and she would lose no longer have her family close. She expressed concern over the value of their homes. Mr. Brandon Fugal suggested that it would be to the advantage of the neighborhood to work with the Fryers. He asked what the neighbors would rather see on that parcel, multifamily housing or commercial. The R2 Overlay option was discussed.
Commissioner Carpenter observed that the Planning Commission can only act on the proposal before them and not conjecture on the future proposals of a property owner. Mrs. Helen Harper felt that any addition to traffic would contribute to the dangerous situation that exists. Mrs. Valerie Eckles stated that she was totally opposed to the multifamily option and cast a vote for the commercial zoning. Mr. Bill Harper suggested that all the homes between State Street and Locust Avenue be rezoned to commercial. Commissioner Sweeten replied that an application would have to be submitted. He expressed the opinion that the neighborhood’s concerns are valid. Growth and the increase of traffic are hard issues. Mr. Mike Harper agreed that, in time, this whole neighborhood would become commercial.
Commissioner Carpenter pointed out that any time there is a transition between commercial and residential, accommodations must be make between them. He agreed that these three homes are taking an unusual hit. He observed that the Commission felt like Solomon. He commented that the transition issue is ever present and will only get worse. Mr. Fryer commented that there is no room in Lindon for farming anymore. He predicted the end of “a little bit of country.”
Mr. Hunt commented that he appreciates the neighborhood’s dilemma, but unfortunately there is transition. He added that economically, there is not a lot of difference between the R2 Overlay project and commercial zoning. He noted that Mr. Clyde is more than willing to do what is necessary to solve issues with the neighborhood. Commissioner Anderson asked if it was in the best interests of the neighborhood to have that parcel zoned commercial. He pointed out that a Taco Time could locate there in the future, even though that is not Mr. Clyde’s intentions for now. Mr. Fugal noted that the next door parcel owned by the Eckles was already zoned commercial. Mrs. Debbie Harper asked why Mr. Clyde did not buy the Eckles property. Mr. Fugal replied that it was not feasible for Mr. Clyde to buy this parcel.
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIONER SWEETEN SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
The Commissioners discussed this parcel’s zoning and the changes that took place as part of the General Plan update. Acting Chairman Peter Peters commented that it was odd that this parcel was left residential when the house next door is commercial. However, he felt that allowing access from State Street to 400 North through this property is going to have impact on the neighborhood. Mr. Smith agreed that this would allow commercial access through to a residential zone. There was a discussion of the future of the bus garage.
Commissioner Simister suggested that it may be unfair to rezone this parcel without considering the property across the street. The Commissioners discussed this issue. Mr. Smith commented that Locust Avenue could be considered the buffer between the residential zone to the east and the commercial property between Locust and State Streets. He observed that if all the property owners there were favorable to this suggestion, it could be considered. The Commission discussed possible commercial development in this area.
Commissioner Carpenter asked if the Commissioners would consider a zone change for this parcel without tying in the neighboring parcels to Locust Avenue. Commissioner Anderson expressed the opinion that this parcel had been partially zoned commercial previously, which give a precedence for the change. However, he pointed out that the opposite side of the street has always been residential. The Commission discussed the options and problems of allowing access from a commercial zone to a residential zone. They also discussed the precedence for a change as suggested by Commissioner Anderson. Acting Chairman Peters suggested that the Commission could make the recommendation to the Council that the zoning of the parcel remain as is unless the full area is considered for change. Commissioner Carpenter noted that not all the property owners are favorable to a zone change.
COMMISSIONER SWEETEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY TIM CLYDE TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION FROM RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY TO COMMERCIAL AND THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM R1-20 TO COMMERCIAL FOR THE PARCEL AT 239 WEST 400 NORTH AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE STREET BE CONSIDERED FOR A SIMILAR CHANGE IF THE PROPERTY OWNERS APPLY. COMMISSIONER ANDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR EXCEPT COMMISSIONERS SIMISTER AND PETERS WHO VOTED NAY. THE MOTION DID NOT CARRY.
Discussion was held on the varying opinions held by the Commissioners. Various motions were suggested.
COMMISSIONER SIMISTER MOVED TO DENY THE REQUEST BY TIM CLYDE TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY TO COMMERCIAL AND THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM R1-20 TO COMMERCIAL FOR THE PARCEL AT 239 WEST 400 NORTH WITH THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER THE REZONING REQUEST IF IT IS AMENDED TO INCLUDE THE WHOLE CORNER TO LOCUST STREET. COMMISSIONER PETERS SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR EXCEPT COMMISSIONERS SWEETEN AND ANDERSON WHO VOTED NAY. THE MOTION DID NOT CARRY.
AFTER DISCUSSION, THE ACTING CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR A REVOTE ON COMMISSIONER SIMISTER’S MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR OF THIS THIRD MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED.
5. RICKS CAR CARE - 645 NORTH GENEVA ROAD - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
This is a request for approval of an auto repair business in the Mixed Commercial zone.
Mr. Smith explained that Mr. Rick Nay wishes to put an auto car care center on his Geneva Road property. He displayed pictures of the subject property and noted that Mr. Nay lives in the home. He explained that the property is presently zoned mixed commercial and is on the future corner of Geneva Road and 700 North Street. He observed that a potential problem may exist in the building’s design to meet the light industrial requirements rather than the mixed commercial requirements. He also noted that Mr. Nay planned for more landscaping to meet the current ordinance. Mr. Nay is also planning to install a rock-like facing to the bottom of the building. Mr. Nay commented that he is willing to do what it takes to make the project work.
Mr. Smith suggested some items that the Planning Commission may wish to review, such as outside storage, landscaping, and the architectural design of the building. Commissioner Sweeten asked Mr. Nay if he planned to pave the lot. Mr. Nay said that eventually he would pave the lot, but he would like to delay the paving until the level of 700 North is determined. He would rather not repave the lot again when the street is finished. Commissioner Sweeten suggested that a temporary, rather than a permanent, conditional use permit may be in Mr. Nay’s best interest.
The Commissioners discussed the possible problems of the site pertaining to the future levels of 700 North. Commissioner Peters mentioned the utility connections may possibly change also, since the home is presently on a septic tank. The location of the home and outside storage were discussed. A sight-obscuring fence for the outside storage was discussed. Commissioner Carpenter noted that this site on the future 700 North will be a gateway into the city. The number of cars that Mr. Nay may possibly have to store was discussed.
Commissioner Simister asked the time table for 700 North. Mr. Smith replied 5-10 years although the hope was for sooner. There was discussion of the suggestion for a temporary conditional use permit. It was observed that the two years would help the City and Mr. Nay plan more for 700 North. Mr. Nay commented that if this would allow him to put in temporary improvements, he would agree to changing his application. The Commission told Mr. Nay that the permit would be reviewed in two years and more permanent improvements required if he still wished to develop the site. Commissioner Anderson observed that storm drain and sewer improvements will be part of the permanent conditional use permit.
Mr. Nay expressed concern about removing the house. It was explained that the house would not need to be removed until Mr. Nay desired to do so. The landscaping requirement for the mixed commercial zone was explained to Mr. Nay. He was informed that the site may need to incorporate more landscaping in the future to meet the 15% requirement. The width and location of the driveway for access from Geneva Road was discussed briefly.
Commissioner Sweeten asked Mr. Nay if he was willing to change to a temporary conditional use permit. Mr. Nay verified that he was willing to change the application to allow more changes to the site plan in the future. The Commissioners asked if Mr. Nay had talked with his neighbor on the south about a fence preference. Mr. Nay replied that he would like to buy the parcel from his neighbor, Mr. Howard Walker, but for now, Mr. Howard Walker has asked to leave the fence as is so that he can keep the weeds under control. Commissioner Anderson suggested a condition on the permit that Mr. Nay would work out the fence with his neighbor.
Commissioner Carpenter asked if the other Commissioners felt that a sight-obscuring fence should be required, or if the screening provided by the house is sufficient. The Commissioners discussed putting a limit on stored vehicles. There was a suggestion of limiting the total number of cars to fifteen that are stored in the back of the home. It was added that this limit does not include what it in the driveway of the home. The driveway width into the business was discussed. Mr. Nay observed that he hoped to widen it to 34 feet. The Commissioners agreed that this was sufficient.
COMMISSIONER SWEETEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY RICK NAY FOR A TEMPORARY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR RICKS CAR CARE AT 645 NORTH GENEVA ROAD WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. THERE BE NO MORE THAN 15 CARS IN THE REPAIR PARKING AREA AT ANY ONE TIME.
2. LANDSCAPING BE COMPLETED AS PRESENTED.
3. THE DRIVEWAY WIDENED TO 34 FEET.
4. THE BUILDING BE FINISHED WITH A MINIMUM 25% OF DECORATIVE MATERIAL IE: ROCK ON THE FRONT AND STUCCO ON THE SIDES AND BACK.
5. GRAVEL BE INSTALLED ON THE PARKING AREA.
6. REACH AN AGREEMENT WITH THE NEIGHBOR ON THE SOUTH SIDE ON THE FENCE.
COMMISSIONER CARPENTER SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
6. KIDS KAMPUS - 496 NORTH 900 EAST - HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT
This is a request for approval of a home day care business.
Mr. Smith introduced this item that has been considered previously. It was continued to consider the home occupation employee question. The home occupation ordinance has now been changed to allow one full-time or part-time equivalent employee(s). Parking must be provided for the employee(s) off-street. The Commissioners reacquainted themselves with the application by asking Ms. Annette Belnap to describe her operation of a dance and preschool business.
Commissioner Carpenter asked how the drop-off and pick-up of students was progressing. Commissiner Anderson asked if the parents were carpooling as requested. Ms. Belnap replied that the parents were cooperating and the transfer of students was being handled well. She informed the Commissioners that her classes totaled 10 students as a time only. Commissioner Sweeten commented that he had observed a safety hazard. There is a set of stairs to the school room with no railing. Ms. Belnap replied that she would be getting a railing soon, but for now they would use the front door. Commissioner Carpenter asked how many employees she had. Ms. Belnap replied that she had her sister-in-law who parks in the driveway off street. It was explained that she could have more than one employee, just not more than one at a time. Commissioner Anderson reminded Ms. Belnap that a home occupation is a conditional use and as such, is reviewable upon complaint.
COMMISSIONER CARPENTER MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF KIDS KAMPUS, A DANCE SCHOOL/DAYCARE AT 496 NORTH 900 EAST WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. THE APPLICANT AGREES THAT THE OUTSIDE STAIRWAY WILL NOT BE USED UNTIL A SAFETY RAILING IS INSTALLED.
2. A LIMIT OF TWELVE STUDENTS AT ANY ONE TIME IS IMPOSED. THIS LIMITATION DOES NOT INCLUDE MS. BELNAP’S OWN CHILDREN.
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
7. OLSEN SUBDIVISION - 250 SOUTH 400 WEST - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
This is a request for a 5-lot subdivision in the R1-20 zone.
Mr. Smith displayed an aerial photo of the area and the proposed subdivision map. He commented that there are not staff concerns. Commissioner Sweeten asked about the rights to the spring on the property. Mr. Chris Olsen replied that the spring has been dry for two years. Mr. Olsen was made aware that the spring may be something to be cautious of because recent dry years may be the cause have made the spring temporarily dry. Commissioner Sweeten asked if the frontages of the lots shown met the requirements. Mr. Smith replied that the frontages are adequate. He explained that the ordinance requires 50 feet on the road and 100 feet of frontage at the thirty foot setback line. He asked if the Commissioners would prefer access for driveways be limited to the culdesac and away from the busy 400 West. The Commissioners agreed. The size of the lots and the slope of the land was discussed. It was noted that the cul-de-sac ends thirty feet in front of the existing home. It was noted that the driveway of the neighboring home to the south would need moving because presently the driveway was being shared by the existing home and the neighbor.
COMMISSIONER SWEETEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY CHRIS OLSEN FOR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL FOR OLSEN SUBDIVISION, A 5-LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AT 250 SOUTH 400 WEST, AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE RECOMMENDATION THAT ALL DRIVEWAYS ACCESS THE CULDESAC RATHER THAN 400 WEST. COMMISSIONER CARPENTER SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
8. BROOKS COMMERCIAL - 1418 WEST 70 SOUTH - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
This is a request to re-plat the existing parcel and building into a 6-unit office/shop condominium plat.
Mr. Mike Young, the shop manager for Jerry Brook’s business, Brookline Farms, was present to answer questions about this application. Mr. Smith explained that this is an existing building that the owner wishes to divide into office condos. The common area will be the parking lot. He added that dividing the building into condos will not change the appearance of the units; it will only allow the owner to sell the individual units. Acting Chairman Peters asked if there was an owners association required to manage the common areas like the parking lot, landscaping, and outside of the building. Mr. Smith replied that the Commission could make this a condition of approval. Commissioner Simister asked if the ordinance places limits on how many units are allowed per acre. Mr. Smith replied that once the parking and landscaping requirements are met, the remaining property can be used for the building. He commented that the ordinance places no limits on the number of units in a building. Commissioner Carpenter asked if dividing an existing building into condo units was commonly done and what problems have arisen in the past. Mr. Smith replied that there were few problems with projects in the past.
COMMISSIONER CARPENTER MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY JERRY BROOKS TO AMEND WESTLIND INDUSTRIAL PARK, PLAT “A,” LOTS 5 AND 6 AT 1418 WEST 70 SOUTH AND CREATE BROOKS COMMERCIAL, PLAT “A,” A 6-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PLAT AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE CONDITION THAT AN OWNERS ASSOCIATION BE FORMED TO MANAGE CUSTOMARY ITEMS. COMMISSIONER SIMISTER SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
9. PLANNING DIRECTOR’S REPORT
1. Discussion concerning the November 13, 2002 meeting and potential field trips.
2. Discussion about possibly canceling the November 27, 2002 and the December 25, 2002 meetings.
Mr. Smith informed the Commissioners that the November 27th meeting is canceled for the Thanksgiving Holiday. He announced that the November 13th meeting is a field trip to visit multihousing units in the area. He added that no regular meeting will be held on this date and the next regular meeting will be on December 11th.
Mr. Smith presented a grading plan for a Canberra Heights lot. He informed the Commissioner Commissioners that staff recommends approval and sees no problems with the plan as presented.
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY CHRIS HAMMOND FOR GRADING PLAN APPROVAL ON CANBERRA HEIGHTS PLAT “C,” LOT #3 WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE PLAN MEET ALL CITY CODES. COMMISSIONER SWEETEN SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Smith reminded the Commissioners to meet at the City Office at 7:00 p.m. on November 13th for the field trip. There was a short discussion of the purpose of the field trip and the projects that would be visited.
ADJOURN
THE COMMISSIONERS AGREED BY CONSENSUS TO ADJOURN AT 10:15 P.M.
APPROVED - December 11, 2002
_______________________________________
Loren Morse, Chairman
Attest,
_______________________________________
Kevin Smith, Planning Director |
|
|
