|
|
Home » City Government » Planning Commission » Planning Commission Schedule 2003 (Agendas & Minutes) » Planning Commission Minutes 2003 » January 22, 2003 Minutes
January 22, 2003 Minutes
The Lindon City Planning Commission held a regularly scheduled meeting on Wednesday, January 22, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. in the Lindon City Center Council Chamber at 100 North State Street, Lindon, Utah.
Conducting: Loren Morse, Chairman
Invocation: Ron Anderson
PRESENT
Ron Anderson, Commissioner
Lori Atchison, Commissioner
Bruce Carpenter, Commissioner
Marilyn Simister, Commissioner
Dustin Sweeten, Commissioner
Lindsey Bayless, Councilmember
Kevin Smith, Planning Director
Venla Gubler, Administrative Clerk
Robert Hammond, Planning Intern
Dustin Huler, Planning Intern
ABSENT
Loren Morse, Chairman
Evan Nixon, Alternate Commissioner
Jim Peters, Commissioner
The Meeting began at 7:04 p.m.
1. MINUTES
Review of the Minutes of December 11, 2002.
The Minutes of the regular meeting of December 11, 2002 were reviewed. The following corrections were made:
Page 4, Line 19: Add the phrase "which adds to its commercial development potential" after the word "access."
Page 7, Line 4: Replace the word "went" with the word "gone."
Page 13, Line 9: Delete the word "the" after the word "that."
Page 13, Line 13: Replace the words "that would" with the word "to."
Page 13, Line 14: Replace the word "agreed" with the word "confirmed."
Page 13, Line 17: Add the letter "s" to the end of the word "dwelling."
Page 13, Line 23: Replace the word "at" with the word "as."
COMMISSIONER ATCHISON MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF DECEMBER 11, 2002 AS CORRECTED. COMMISSIONER SWEETEN SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mr. Todd Lowe, with Torque Shop, told the Commissioners that he had submitted an application for a conditional use at 848 W 600 S to put a second business in the Certified Transmission building. He asked the Commissioners what conditions or objections they would have to making one-half of this building into an auto repair business. Mr. Smith displayed an aerial of the site and informed the Commissioners that this would be an expansion of a legal nonconforming use since the zone change of last year amended the zoning of this area from light industrial to commercial. This application will not change the dimensions of the building and will only put multiple businesses into one building. He pointed out that the present occupant has stored some inoperable vehicles on the lot which is a code violation. Mr. Lowe acknowledged the problem and replied that the inoperable vehicles were being removed. Mr. Smith commented that staff has no problems with the application if the businesses are in compliance with the zoning. He suggested a sight obscuring fence for storage of vehicles being worked on by the business.
Mr. Lowe observed that he was working with Mr. Larry Bloodworth of Certified Transmissions to bring the site into compliance. He suggested that a chain link fence with slats to enclose an area in the back would not enhance the area and felt that a fenced area on the west side of the building may be more acceptable. There was a discussion of the retaining wall between this parcel and the one to the west. Commissioner Anderson expressed a concern that a screen will be needed on top of the wall to shield cars from view of the new business that may locate on the old truck stop.
Commissioner Simister asked what a new business going into this site would have to do. Mr. Smith replied that it depended on whether the use of the site was changing and if the site had been vacant an extended period. Since this business was considered an automotive repair use similar to the existing one and the site has not been vacated, there are no requirements to bring the site into compliance with the new zone. It will add a new business license to the site, but is not changing the outside dimensions of the building. Commissioner Carpenter commented that it seems to be an issue of whether the City wishes to reduce nonconforming uses. Commissioner Sweeten observed that whatever use builds to the west will help determine the future uses of the area. Commissioner Carpenter suggested that this business could be considered a new nonconforming use rather than an expansion of an existing use, but that this use does not pose a problem to the area for now. Commissioner Anderson suggested that as long as the business corrects the violations, it fits in with the neighboring uses. There was a discussion of Mr. Lowe's suggestion for a yard on the side rather than the back. There were questions about limits on the number of cars. Mr. Smith replied that this application would be considered as an agenda item and limits could be set as part of the conditional use. Commissioner Sweeten commented to Mr. Lowe that the application appeared to be acceptable, but that there would be some conditions. Mr. Lowe thanked the Commissioners for their comments.
3. NEW BUSINESS (Reports by Commissioners)
Commissioner Atchison asked if the fate of the trees on State Street near 600 North had been decided. Mr. Smith replied that he and City Engineer Mark Christensen had met with Lars Anderson and Barry Sawsack of UDOT to consider the trees in relation to the future curb line. He noted that the trees will need to be removed eventually, but that, for now, the trees would remain. Commissioner Carpenter asked if the fence issue had been resolved between the property owners on 600 North. Mr. Smith replied yes.
Commissioner Simister asked about future development in an area where the sewer lines are not deep enough to meet code. Mr. Smith explained that sewer lines are typically put in by a developer and not a homeowner. Before the city accepts the installation, the lines are inspected. If the sewer lines have been accepted by the city, any future repairs or improvements are done at city expense. If a new development attempts to connect to a sewer line that is not adequate, the engineers attempt to find an alternate, and more acceptable, route to connect to the sewer system.
THE COMMISSIONERS DECIDED BY CONSENSUS THAT COMMISSIONER ANDERSON SHOULD CONDUCT THE MEETING IN THE ABSENCE OF THE CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN.
4. FRYER PROPERTY 370 NORTH STATE STREET - SITE PLAN
This is a request for an eight unit retail development along State Street with a warehouse to the rear of the site.
Mr. Mark Greenwood of ALM Associates, was representing the owner, Tim Clyde. Mr. Smith commented that the Commission had looked at this application before as part of a zone change request. The zoning is currently commercial. The applicant is proposing an 8-unit retail building and a warehouse. The access to the warehouse is from State Street and not from 400 North as previously requested. The fire marshal has requested that alternate access be negotiated from the Alpine School District through the Alpine Transition and Employment Center site. Mr. Greenwood observed that tentative inquiries for an emergency crash gate and use of the existing hydrant have been received favorably. Mr. Smith commented that the city is favorable to looping the water line for increased reliability of fire flow. He identified the type of architecture and materials proposed for the building and warehouse.
Commissioner Carpenter expressed concern about backing vehicles in the entrance of the parking lot creating a hazard to decelerating vehicles entering the site, and concern about the width of the rear access lane. It was determined that the width of the lane was 24 feet. Commissioner Carpenter observed that trucks accessing the warehouse may block customer parking. Mr. Greenwood replied that truck deliveries are easily made before or after customer hours. Acting Chairman Anderson commented that the parking lot entrance seems inadequate to accommodate decelerating vehicles from State Street. Mr. Greenwood noted that State Street has a full deceleration lane on the right side. Commissioner Carpenter agreed, but noted that this lane may not exist in the future if State Street is expanded as planned to six lanes. He asked what type of retail uses were expected to use the parking spaces. Mr. Greenwood replied that Mr. Clyde proposed to condominiumize the building and parking was planned at 1 to 3 spaces per unit. Mr. Smith confirmed that this number of spaces meets the code.
Mr. Smith also noted that the fire marshal had inspected and approved the site plan for safety issues. The Commissioners discussed fire truck access through the Alpine School District site.
Commissioner Simister asked about the finishing materials of the retail space and warehouse. Mr. Greenwood replied that the buildings would be metal with a stucco finish. He assured the Commissioners that there would be no exposed metal and the stucco finish would be aesthetically pleasing.
Acting Chairman Anderson asked about the wall that would buffer the residential zone to the east and north of the warehouse. Mr. Smith replied that the owner had requested to have vinyl fence since that is his business. Acting Chairman Anderson asked if the neighborhood had been consulted. Mr. Greenwood replied that this would be done.
Commissioner Sweeten asked if there were other concerns from staff. Mr. Smith replied no. Acting Chairman Anderson confirmed that the access to the warehouse met with the Development Review Committee's approval. Commissioner Atchison asked about landscaping. Mr. Greenwood explained the plans. Commissioner Carpenter initiated discussion on possibly removing a parking space to allow more buffer for slowing vehicles in the entrance to the parking lot.
COMMISSIONER SWEETEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY TIM CLYDE FOR APPROVAL OF AN 8 UNIT RETAIL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AT APPROXIMATELY 370 NORTH STATE STREET WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. THAT SECONDARY ACCESS BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL, AND
2. THAT THE TYPE OF FENCE USED TO BUFFER THE SITE FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES BE WORKED OUT WITH THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS.
COMMISSIONER CARPENTER SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
3. LES SCHWAB TIRES - 600 WEST 600 SOUTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
This is a request for approval of retail tire slaes sales and installation business in the Lindon Park Station Plat "C" into one lot for the Les Schwab Tire Center.
Mr. Paul Grady was representing Les Schwab Tire Stores. Mr. Smith displayed the artist's conception of the site. Mr. Grady showed the Commissioners a color material board that shows the colors of the brick and trim in shades of rust and cream. Mr. Smith commented that the Planning Commission will be making a recommendation to the Redevelopment Agency. He suggested that the colors that are approved be referred to those displayed on the color board. He pointed out the location of the "Welcome to Lindon" entry sign on the site plan and the decorative fencing. Mr. Grady noted that the last discussion raised a concern about the location of utilities under the sign location, but the sign is not large enough to warrant a deep foundation so will not disturb the lines. He pointed out the location and colors on the Les Schwab sign. Commissioner Carpenter commented that the colors blend nicely into the neighborhood. Commissioner Simister observed that she approved the fence. Acting Chairman Anderson asked if there were any concerns. There were none. Mr. Grady informed the Commission that the contract for the building would be awarded by March and the completion date is set for July.
COMMISSIONER CARPENTER MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY LES SCHWAB TIRES FOR A TIRE SALES AND INSTALLATION BUSINESS AT THE CORNER OF 600 SOUTH AND 600 WEST AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WITH THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. THAT THE LANDSCAPING, COLORS AS PROPOSED ON THE COLOR BOARD AND VINYL FENCING BE INSTALLED AS PROPOSED IN THE SUBMITTED SITE PLANS AND ARTIST'S CONCEPTION.
COMMISSIONER ATCHISON SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
4. LINDON PARK STATION PLAT "D" - 600 WEST 600 SOUTH - SUBDIVISION AMENDMENT
This is a request for approval to combine the existing two lots of Lindon Park Station Plat "C" into one lot for the Les Schwab Tire Center.
Mr. Smith informed the Commissioners that the subdivision plat combines two lots into one and showed the proposal to them.
After discussion, COMMISSIONER ATCHISON MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY LES SCHWAB TIRE FOR AN AMENDMENT TO LINDON PARK STATION PLAT "C" AND CREATE LINDON PARK STATION PLAT "D," A ONE-LOT SUBDIVISION AT THE CORNER OF 600 SOUTH AND 600 WEST. COMMISSIONER CARPENTER SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
5. SAFE AND SECURE SELF STORAGE - 2000 WEST 500 NORTH - SITE PLAN
This is a request for approval of a self storage unit business.
Mr. Dan Frandsen was in the audience to present this proposal. Mr. Smith observed that this application had been a design review at a previous meeting. He pointed out the changes in the site plan since the last presentation, including additional landscaping, wrought iron fencing on the frontage roads and visible areas, and the architecture and colors of the units. He commented that the Frandsens are proposing to build the project in phases and pointed out the first phase. He showed the asphalt in the entrance area and the caretaker facility and observed that the applicants were planning gravel for the access through the rest of the project.
Acting Chairman Anderson asked what construction materials would be used. Mr. Frandsen replied that brown split face block would be used with green doors and roofing. Acting Chairman Anderson noted an easement for access to the parcel to the east which had been moved from 500 North to the south line of this property. The water line location was determined. Mr. Smith commented that the Development Review Committee had spent a lot of time discussing the location of water and sewer lines to promote development of this area. Mr. Frandsen added that they would access the water line near 2000 West and run their own fire flow line to reduce the need for easements to the Goodfellow water line. The hydrant locations on the site were pointed out.
Commissioner Atchison asked when the next phase is anticipated. Mr. Frandsen replied that, for their own protection, they planned future expansion when the first phase was mostly occupied. Commissioner Atchison asked what phase would be fenced. Mr. Frandsen replied that the whole parcel would be fenced and not each phase individually. Acting Chairman Anderson asked the materials of the fence. Mr. Frandsen replied that the back and side fences would be of 6 foot vinyl coated chain link fencing and the front, visible areas would be wrought iron set between pillars.
Commissioner Carpenter asked if other storage was planned for the second phase area before construction. Mr. Frandsen replied that there would be no open storage allowed. Commissioner Sweeten asked about the back of the last row of units serving as a block fence on the east side. Mr. Frandsen pointed out that there is a seven and one-half foot public utility easement so the block wall would be away from the chain link fence.
Commissioner Carpenter confirmed the colors of the block and doors. Mr. Frandsen affirmed brown or tan block with dark green roofs and doors. He also noted that there would be block on the end of the rows, but not between the units. Commissioner Carpenter asked about stepping the units through the natural ground elevations. Mr. Frandsen showed where this was planned.
Acting Chairman Anderson asked if the site plan landscaping meets the zoning requirement of a 15% minimum. Mr. Frandsen replied that the whole site should meet the requirements, but that the individual phases may not. He explained that most of the landscaping was on the front and so the first phase would have an abundance and the second phase may not be adequate on its own. Mr. Smith commented that he would verify the percentages.
Acting Chairman Anderson reinitiated discussion about the possibility of not having a public utility easement on the east side so that the block wall would be on the property line and reduce the need for weed control. There was also a discussion of paving the access from 2000 West to their entrance, since the access to Goodfellow was gravel. Mr. Frandsen agreed to this proposal.
COMMISSION SWEETEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY DAN FRANDSEN FOR APPROVAL OF SAFE AND SECURE SELF STORAGE, A GENERAL WAREHOUSING AND STORAGE BUSINESS AT APPROXIMATELY 2000 WEST AND 500 NORTH WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. THAT UNTIL PHASE TWO IS COMPLETED, THE FENCING ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT BE OF COMPARABLE QUALITY AND CONSTRUCTION AS THAT ON THE ADJOINING SOUTH AND NORTH SIDES.
COMMISSIONER ATCHISON SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
6. SAFE AND SECURE SELF STORAGE - 2000 WEST 500 NORTH - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT
This is a request for approval to subdivide a portion of the property for the storage unit complex. This is a one lot subdivision.
After discussion, COMMISSIONER CARPENTER MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY DAN FRANDSEN FOR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL FOR SAFE AND SECURE SELF STORAGE PLAT "A," A ONE LOT SUBDIVISION AT APPROXIMATELY 500 NORTH 2000 WEST, AND RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL. COMMISSIONER SIMISTER SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
7. WASHINGTON ACCESSORY APARTMENT - 325 WEST 40 SOUTH - PLANNING COMMISSION APPEAL
This is a request for Planning Commission review of an application for an accessory apartment in Saddle Ridge Subdivision.
Mr. Bryan Washington was invited to the front to answer questions. Mr. Smith informed the Commissioners that Mr. Washington had requested a building permit and during the noticing required by the accessory apartment ordinance, staff received a request for a hearing. He displayed the site plan and pointed out the planned parking space for the accessory apartment on the east side of the home. He noted that these plans meet the requirements of the ordinance. He then displayed the elevations and floor plan of the home and noted that the requirements of the ordinance are met. Commissioner Carpenter verified that there were no conflicts with the city code.
Commissioner Sweeten addressed the audience as a neighbor and explained the R2 Overlay ordinance which includes the provisions for accessory apartments. He recognized the concerns of the neighborhood and that the C, C, & R's prohibit accessory apartments. However, he informed the neighbors present that the City does not enforce C, C & R's, just the provisions of State and City Codes. It is up to the homeowners association to enforce their own contracts by civil means. Mr. Smith explained that accessory apartments are allowed only in homes that are owner occupied and are enforced as such. He explained the enforcement measures taken to ensure that homes are not turned into duplexes and that there are very few complaints of such in Lindon.
There were several neighbors in the audience. Michael Seaver and Jolene Campbell were some who expressed concerns about no sidewalks and narrow streets, the concentration of rental units in the general area, homeowners using rental income to stretch into a home that they would not be able to afford, possibilities of the home being turned into a duplex, and the stability of the neighborhood. Mr. Smith addressed the traffic issue and the unit number and spacing limitations of the R2 Overlay ordinance. Commissioner Sweeten cautioned the neighborhood on creating rifts in neighborly connections. Commissioner Carpenter explained the reasoning for not concentrating high density housing into one area. The C, C, & R issue was discussed and Mr. Washington commented that the developer had approved his plans.
COMMISSIONER CARPENTER MOVED TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION FOR AN ACCESSORY APARTMENT BY LAURA AND BRYAN WASHINGTON IN SADDLE RIDGE ESTATES SUBDIVISION, PLAT "B" LOT 24 BASED ON THE FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED APARTMENT COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY CODE. COMMISSIONER ATCHISON SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
8. REVIEW OF GRADING PLANS FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL HOME CONSTRUCTION
1. Castle Builders - Canberra Heights Subdivision, Plat "A," Lot 11.
Mr. Smith informed the Commissioners that staff had no concerns with this proposed grading plan. He displayed the location of the lot and noted that the rear elevations had been revised to meet the requirements of stepping and breaking up flat walls required by the Hillside Overlay ordinance. Acting Chairman Anderson noted that the pool was located in the rear setback. Mr. Smith explained that accessory structures are allowed up to the public utility easement. City Engineer Mark Christensen's notes were read and discussed. There was a discussion of the collector sumps and drainage of the pool into the sewer. Commissioner Carpenter commented on the wall design and the erosion controls.
COMMISSIONER CARPENTER MOVED TO APPROVE THE REQUEST BY CASTLE BUILDERS FOR GRADING PLAN APPROVAL FOR CANBERRA HEIGHTS PLAT "A" LOT 11 AT APPROXIMATELY 62 SOUTH DENALI CIRCLE. COMMISSIONER SIMISTER SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
9. WEST SIDE HOUSING STUDY - DISCUSSION ITEM
The Planning Commission will discuss various housing and development options for areas around the new freeway off ramp.
Mr. Smith told the Commissioners that he feels there are three options for residential development of the west side of Lindon. Option One is to allow no housing at all. Option Two is to just allow the units that the present sewer limitations will service. The final option is to upgrade the sewer system and allow as much as 600 to 700 new housing units there. He had the engineers study the feasibility to upgrade the sewer system to allow housing units on the west side and they have found a solution that may work. He suggested a project of about 400 units of mixed density, including twin homes, duplexes, and stacked condos. He felt that a project of about 200 single family homes on 8,000 to 10,000 square foot lots may also be considered for a maximum of 650 units. He felt the projects could tie into about 50 to 60 acres of commercial development with pedestrian-friendly characteristics and possibly some shops with homes on top. He felt that this mix would help drive the commercial development.
Commissioner Atchison asked what density he was proposing. Mr. Smith replied about 9 to 10 units per acre. Commissioner Carpenter asked why Lindon should consider a mixed density proposal such as this. Mr. Smith replied that housing would spur the commercial development, drive infrastructure improvements, and possibly eliminate the R2 Overlay ordinance. He commented that the concerns about the problems associated with high density projects are design related and can be avoided. There was a discussion of Riverwood. Commissioner Carpenter observed that Riverwood is not a large project and the shopping provides a buffer for the neighborhood. Mr. Smith asserted that a well designed residential project with well designed commercial will last with minimal problems.
Commissioner Carpenter commended Mr. Smith for pushing for a plan so that the City is not at the mercy of developers proposing projects in isolated spots. Mr. Smith offered to prepare a report with various options for high density projects for the Commissioners to review. He discussed various types of projects in Orem and Lehi. There was discussion of the focus group notes.
Acting Chairman Anderson expressed the opinion that Lindon needed to look at the long range and how the improvements are going to be done. He touched on impact fees and how they may affect the property owners' ability to sell the property. He expressed the opinion that the City should consider enough homes there to have a community or to have no residential development at all. Commissioner Simister commented that it was up to the City to decide what to do or developers would take the initiative away from the planners. Councilmember Bayless noted that there are strong opinions in the Council, Planning Commission and among residents on this subject but the clear consensus is that no one wants to have high density near their home. The problems arise in creating something that will have to be lived with in the future. Mr. Smith observed that the R2 Overlay ordinance does good things, but agreed with Councilmember Bayless that most residents don't want units in their own neighborhood. Allowing high density housing on the west side provides this service to the community without the neighborhood feeling "targeted." He added that it would be easier for him not to have to deal with disgruntled residents, but the decision is still what is best for the community. Commissioner Sweeten commented that those who move onto the west side will move there already knowing what is planned in the area. Councilmember Bayless pointed out that the other side of the coin is the impact on schools and other services, as well as the social implications. Commissioner Carpenter agreed that there are costs beyond the money ones.
Acting Chairman Anderson observed that something needs to be decided as it is frustrating and unfair to the property owners. Mr. Smith asked for an opinion on his proposal. Commissioner Carpenter commented that the final decision lies with the Council, not the Planning Commission. Commissioner Simister asked what Pleasant Grove is planning next to this area. This was discussed. Mr. Smith observed that Lindon needs ownership opportunities, not rental apartments. Commissioners Carpenter and Atchison expressed a preference for smaller single family lots. Councilmember Bayless commented that the City had been told by more than one developer that single family home lots would not be feasible. Mr. Smith replied that it was not the City's responsibility to make sure that property owners make a profit, just to set what is acceptable. Property owners may have to adjust the value of their property to make such a project feasible. Impact fees in Pleasant Grove were discussed.
Acting Chairman Anderson commented that Lindon was not in a race with Pleasant Grove or American Fork. There was a lot of commercially zoned property in this area to develop. Mr. Smith asked what information the Commissioners would like to see to understand the housing issues. There was discussion of the priorities for consideration of a large high density project. Mr. Smith verified that the Commissioners agreed with him that ownership opportunities rather than rentals are the first issue. Commissioner Carpenter confirmed that this may make the project more palatable, but it may not make a project economically feasible. The infrastructure needs were touched on. Mr. Smith asked the Commissioners if they would like to see pictures of what is being done. The Commissioners agreed that this would help. Mr. Smith told them that he would have a presentation for the February 12th meeting.
10. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
1. Review of conditions of approval for the Lindon Mobile Home Park.
2. Election of Planning Commission Chair for 2003.
Mr. Smith referred to the "mystery drawing" in the staff report and explained that this was a drawing submitted as a courtesy from Pleasant Grove showing a condo plan near the border on 700 North behind the new Walkers. The Commissioner Commissioners expressed thanks to Pleasant Grove for sharing this information.
Mr. Smith informed the Commissioners of an attempt to move in two old trailers to the Lindon Mobile Homes Park. He reminded the Commissioners of the modular housing that was approved in the review for expansion of a legal nonconforming use hearing for the Lindon Mobile Home Park. He also commented on zoning violations in the park. The condition of the trailer houses in the park were discussed. Clean up of the site and management issues were discussed. Commissioner Carpenter asked if these issues could be construed as violations of the conditional use permit. Mr. Smith replied that the trailer park had been there longer than records of the conditional use permits existed. He added that the nuisance ordinance was stronger than the conditional use ordinance. Acting Chairman Anderson commented on the general depreciation of the neighborhood. The consensus of the Commissioners was that the minutes of the hearing to consider expansion of the legal nonconforming use were needed for review before any decisions were made.
The Commissioners considered the election of a new chairperson for the calendar year 2003. Acting Chairman Anderson nominated Commissioner Carpenter to the position of Chairperson. Commissioner Atchison nominated Commission Commissioner Sweeten as Vice Chairperson. Commissioner Simister moved that the nominations cease. Ballots were cast and counted. The vote was unanimous that the position of Chairperson is to held by Commissioner Bruce Carpenter for the calendar year of 2003. The position of Vice Chairperson was unanimously voted to be held by Commissioner Dustin Sweeten for the calendar year of 2003.
ADJOURN
COMMISSIONER ATCHISON MOVED TO ADJOURN THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 10:54 P.M. COMMISSIONER SIMISTER SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL PRESENT VOTED IN FAVOR. THE MOTION CARRIED.
APPROVED - February 12, 2003
|
|
|
